走向偏见推理的一般框架:基于连贯性的推理
Dan Simon1,2, Stephen J Read2
1Gould School of Law, University of Southern California.
概括
基于连贯性的推理为理解认知偏见提供了一个统一的框架. 当内部网络有缺陷时,这种适应性心理过程会导致错误,解释各种推理偏差.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 关于认知偏见的现有研究是广泛的,但分散的,缺乏统一的理论.
- 了解规范推理的偏差对于认知科学至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 提出基于连贯性的推理作为解释认知偏见的节的理论框架.
- 在一个单一的,连贯的模型下整合偏见研究中的各种发现.
主要方法:
- 基于连接主义网络和约束满足处理的概念框架开发.
- 应用框架来解释已确定的偏见,如确认偏见,光环效应和有动机的推理.
主要成果:
- 基于连贯性的推理提供了一个适应性精神装置,可以被非规范性网络元素破坏.
- 该框架成功解释了广泛的偏见推理现象.
结论:
- 基于连贯性的推理为众多认知偏见提供了统一而节的解释.
- 这一框架强调了自适应性认知过程如何成为系统错误的来源.
关键词:
影响影响影响影响影响影响.自动处理自动处理.偏见 偏见 偏见 偏见 偏见认知 认知 认知基于连贯性的推理.在决策过程中做出决定.情绪 情绪 情绪 情绪 情绪目标 目标 目标 目标 目标.审判的判断判断的判断.动机 激励 动机推理 推理 推理奖励 奖励 奖励 奖励 奖励社会认知 (social cognition) 是一种社会认知.思考 思考 思考 思考 思考这是无意识的无意识.更多相关视频
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
10.0K
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
10.0K
相关概念视频
Deductive Reasoning
55.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.3K
Inductive Reasoning
60.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.5K
Reasoning
80
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
80
Bias
4.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.2K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
