相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling

Published on: January 17, 2025

冠状病毒焦虑量表:跨国测量不变性和融合有效性证据

Veljko Jovanović¹, Maksim Rudnev², Mohamed Abdelrahman³

¹Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Novi Sad.

Psychological assessment

|November 27, 2023

概括

冠状病毒焦虑量表 (CAS) 在60个国家展示了强大的测量不变性,验证了其在全球评估焦虑症状中的使用. 它的分数与对COVID-19的恐惧和生活满意度相关,支持其融合有效性.

科学领域:

心理评估心理评估
跨文化心理学跨文化心理学
心理测量心理测量心理测量

背景情况:

冠状病毒焦虑量表 (CAS) 是与冠状病毒相关的体质焦虑症状的关键衡量标准.
全球心理健康研究需要经过验证的工具,以跨文化应用.

研究的目的:

在60个国家检查CAS的测量不变性.
评估CAS得分与COVID-19恐惧 (FCV-19S) 和对生活的满意度 (SWLS-3) 的融合有效性.

主要方法:

在大型国际样本 (N=21,513) 上使用了精确的不变性测试和调整程序.
采用重新采样技术,以确保不平衡样本的稳定性.
与FCV-19S和SWLS-3相关的CAS得分.

主要成果:

单因子CAS模型在大多数国家都很适合;在56个国家发现了部分标量不变性.
调整程序显示了高的测量不变性 (91%的不变参数).
CAS评分与FCV-19S正相关,与SWLS-3负相关,支持融合有效性,尽管差异估计提出了挑战.

结论:

CAS是评估冠状病毒相关焦虑的心理测量和文化不变措施.
这项研究提供了强有力的证据来证明CAS的融合有效性.
可能需要进一步的研究来解决隐藏方差估计的挑战.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment

Published on: December 6, 2024

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates...

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

Cross-Sectional Research

Cross-Sectional Research

In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...