评估互联网信息策划算法的规范框架
David Lazer1,2,3, Briony Swire-Thompson2,3,4, Christo Wilson1,3
1Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University.
概括
本研究引入了一个评估信息策划算法的框架. 它评估个人用户的影响和更广泛的社会影响,为决策者和研究人员提供工具.
科学领域:
- 数字媒体研究 数字媒体研究
- 算法治理 - 算法治理是指指算法治理的方法.
- 信息科学 信息科学 信息科学
背景情况:
- 算法策划在线信息,显著影响用户的曝光.
- 了解算法对社会价值观的影响至关重要.
- 现有的评估缺乏全面的规范框架.
研究的目的:
- 为评估信息整理算法提出一个规范框架.
- 在个人和系统层面评估算法.
- 以指导未来的研究,并为政策干预提供信息.
主要方法:
- 制定了一个两层次的评估框架:个人和系统.
- 个别评估标准:用户利益对齐,准确性和"机构黑客攻击" (过于有吸引力的内容).
- 系统性评估标准:公民效应 (例如,两极化),分配/歧视效应和反竞争平台优势.
主要成果:
- 该框架为算法评估提供了一个结构化的方法.
- 确定个人层面的关键问题:相关性,准确性和用户自我监管.
- 突出系统性风险:政治两极化,歧视和市场主导地位.
结论:
- 拟议的框架为评估信息策划算法提供了一个强大的工具.
- 它有助于更深入地了解算法对社会的影响.
- 旨在赋予政策制定者和研究人员以促进更健康的信息生态系统.
相关概念视频
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
806
The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
806
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
844
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
844
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
1.6K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
1.6K


