如何看待不同类型的环保主义者:根据特征改变看法
Karolin Kibele1, Miriam Rosa2, Milan Obaidi3,4
1Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Frontiers in psychology
|November 29, 2023
概括
关于环保主义者的刻板印象可能会阻碍参与. 这项研究发现,感知到的典型性和与环保主义者的自我认同受到性别,职业和行为等特定属性的影响,为环境信息提供了洞察力.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 环境心理学 环境心理学
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- 对环保主义者的刻板印象是阻碍公众参与和认同环保主义者的障碍.
- 关于影响公众认知和自我认同的特定环保主义属性的理解有限.
研究的目的:
- 调查虚构的环保主义者形象的各种属性如何影响公众的认知和自我认同.
- 解决关于塑造公众论的环保主义者的独特特征的知识差距.
主要方法:
- 利用了对678名美国居民的联合实验.
- 分析了对虚构的环保主义者个人资料的反应,其性别,职业和亲环保主义类型各不相同.
- 评估对刻板印象 (能力,友好,可信度),感知典型性和自我认同的影响.
主要成果:
- 被认为更典型的环保主义者的个人资料被描述为女性,亚洲人,清洁工或办公室职员,政治上温和/自由主义者,并表现出私人和温和的环境行为.
- 参与者最认同的个人资料被描绘为女性,在更清洁的职业中,并展示私人亲环境行为.
- 当与私人亲环保行为或更清洁的职业相关联时,非典型的个人资料描述对印象产生了积极的影响.
结论:
- 结果提供了对印象形成和在心理学研究中使用联合分析的见解.
- 为环保运动提供了关于信息框架的宝贵投入,考虑与观众相对的来源和内容.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Factors Affecting Perception
1.6K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.6K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Naturalistic Observations
15.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.5K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K


