Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

428
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
428
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

291
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
291
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

231
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
231
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

170
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

197
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
197
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

742
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
742

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Instrumental Variable Estimation of Marginal Structural Mean Models for Time-Varying Treatment.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2026
Same author

Finding distributions that differ, with false discovery rate control.

Biometrika·2026
Same author

Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Optimal Policies in Multilevel Studies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same author

Combining Observational Studies to Reduce Multiple Biases.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Ionising radiation and cancer: a UN review of the recent epidemiological evidence.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Spatial analysis of residential location at birth, PFAS in public water, and childhood cancers in Southern California (2000-2019).

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

在流行病学中因果推理的普遍差异差异.

Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen1, Chan Park1, David B Richardson2

  • 1From the Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|November 30, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

普遍差异差异为观测研究提供了一个强大的因果推理方法. 这种方法放松了平行趋势假设,使复杂的结果和非线性效应的分析,增强因果效应评估.

更多相关视频

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

553

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

553

科学领域:

  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 计量经济学 计量经济学

背景情况:

  • 差异差异 (DiD) 是观察性研究中因果推断的一个普遍方法.
  • 标准的DiD依赖于平行趋势假设,这种假设可能会因二进制,计数或多种结果或非添加混效应而被违反.
  • 违反并行趋势假设限制了标准的DiD在许多现实世界的场景的可信性.

研究的目的:

  • 引入一种新的因果推理方法,即普遍差异差异 (UDD).
  • 将限制性平行趋势假设替换为更灵活的几率比率等同混假设.
  • 为了在标准的DiD假设无法维持的环境中实现可靠的因果效应估计.

主要方法:

  • 拟议的普遍差异差异 (UDD) 方法使用一个赔率比率等同混假设.
  • 它采用一种通用线性模型,将暴露前的结果与暴露联系起来,以确定因果关系.
  • 开发和介绍了全参数和半参数UDD估计器.

主要成果:

  • 该方法成功地估计了因果关系,包括非线性,如量子治疗效应.
  • 该方法通过现实应用来证明,该应用评估了寨卡病毒爆发对巴西出生率的影响.
  • 该研究说明了开发的UDD估计器的实际应用和稳定性.

结论:

  • 当并行趋势不满足时,通用差异差异为标准的DiD提供了一个强大的替代方案.
  • 该方法增强了复杂数据结构和非线性关系的因果推理能力.
  • 统一开发提供了一个更普遍适用的框架来评估观察性研究中的干预措施.