在以团队为基础的竞争中对不道德行为的心理约束
Yi Zhu1, Lijing Zheng2, Yu Hu3
1School of Early-Childhood Education, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Frontiers in psychology
|November 30, 2023
概括
与个人竞争相比,团体竞争减少了不道德的行为. 集体有效性进一步制了团队内部的不道德行为,为团队动态和道德决策提供了洞察力.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 伦理学 伦理学 伦理学
背景情况:
- 不道德行为的研究是广泛的,但群体竞争对个人行为的影响仍然未得到充分探索.
- 社会学习理论为理解群体动态如何影响伦理行为提供了一个框架.
研究的目的:
- 调查以小组为基础的竞争如何影响团队内的个人不道德行为.
- 检查集体有效性在以集体为基础的竞争环境中的调节作用.
主要方法:
- 进行了三项研究:两项实验室实验和一项涉及银行员工的实地研究.
- 参与集团或个人竞争的参与者,有货币激励.
- 数据收集包括实验操纵和自我报告的不道德行为的措施和集体有效性.
主要成果:
- 与基于个人竞争相比,基于团体的竞争导致的不道德行为较少.
- 与个人竞争不同,群体竞争在获胜和失败条件之间的不道德行为中没有显著差异.
- 集体疗效与以小组为基础的竞争环境中的不道德行为有负面联系.
结论:
- 集体有效性是缓解集体竞争环境中的不道德行为的关键因素.
- 研究结果有助于理解群体体体验如何塑造道德决策和行为.
相关概念视频
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
6.4K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.4K


