Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Surveys02:16

Surveys

14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

353
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
353
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

130
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
130
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.1K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Redesigning ecosystems for all children to enhance health and well-being: An American Academy of Nursing consensus paper.

Nursing outlook·2026
Same author

Scholarly Dialogue: Nursing's Future-Philosophy of Science in Nursing.

Nursing science quarterly·2026
Same author

Fundamental Patterns of Knowing: A Reflection.

ANS. Advances in nursing science·2025
Same author

A Mixed Methods Exploration of Compassion Satisfaction, Compassion Fatigue, and Emergency Nurses' Caring Ability.

Journal of emergency nursing·2025
Same author

"Here I Don't Feel Like a Stranger": Adolescents' Perspectives on School-Based Health Centers.

The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses·2023
Same author

Hidden No More: Addressing the Health and Wellness of LGBTQIA+ Individuals in Nursing School Curricula.

The Journal of nursing education·2023

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K

改变测试答案:一个范围审查.

Jean S Coffey1, Annette T Maruca1, E Carol Polifroni2

  • 1231 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT 06268, United States of America.

Nurse education today
|December 1, 2023
PubMed
概括

改变考试答案可以提高成绩,这与常见的假设相反. 这次审查发现,答案的变化往往导致更正确的答案,得分的提高高达45.15%.

关键词:
追溯回溯 追溯回溯 追溯回溯答案的改变 答案的改变范围审查 范围审查测试智慧的测试方法

更多相关视频

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

18.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 9, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

18.5K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

科学领域:

  • 教育心理学教育心理学
  • 学术评估学术评估

背景情况:

  • 在全球范围内,关于改变答案对各个学术水平考试成绩的影响仍然存在矛盾的信念.
  • 特别是护理教育,面临着关于允许学生改变他们最初的反应的价值的持续辩论.

研究的目的:

  • 进行范围审查,探索现有证据,探讨本科生和研究生之间的答案变化.
  • 专注于护理教育背景下的答案变化的影响.

主要方法:

  • 一个由Arksey和O'Malley框架指导的范围审查,并使用PRISMA-ScR检查清单进行报告.
  • 在多个数据库中使用关键词如"答案变化"",回溯"和"测试智慧"进行系统的文献搜索.
  • 包括十项符合不同学科本科生或研究生标准的研究,重点是护理教育.

主要成果:

  • 审查显示,改变答案主要导致将错误的答案转换为正确的答案.
  • 观察到显著的得分改善,一些研究报告由于答案修改而高达45.15%的增加.

结论:

  • 这些发现挑战了改变答案会对考试成绩产生负面影响的假设,这表明它可以提高准确性.
  • 证据支持在学术评估中允许答案变化.
  • 由于在审查的研究中采用的方法的异质性,建议进行进一步的研究.