在非WEIRD推理者中去除偏见的思维
Esther Boissin1, Mathilde Josserand2, Wim De Neys3
1Université Paris Cité, LaPsyDÉ, Paris, France.
Cognition
|December 3, 2023
概括
人类推理偏见很普遍,甚至在非西方社会. 消除偏见的干预措施,比如为基准率任务培训,可以在全球范围内提高推理能力,这表明表现,而不仅仅是能力是关键.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 跨文化心理学 跨文化心理学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 人类的推理容易产生偏见,特别是在西方受过教育的工业化富人民主 (WEIRD) 人口中.
- 来自非WEIRD社会的有限数据表明潜在的更强的推理偏见.
- 偏见可能源于缺乏逻辑知识 (能力) 或未能应用它 (性能).
研究的目的:
- 调查非工业化人口中推理偏见的竞争力与绩效账户之间的差异.
- 通过使用基准利率任务来测试缓解干预的有效性.
主要方法:
- 在纳米比亚的非工业化群体Himba人群中进行了脱贫干预.
- 参与者在短时间的培训课程之前和之后完成了基准费率任务.
- 评估了学校教育和生活环境对减肥有效性的影响.
主要成果:
- 大多数参与者在培训后表现出成功的退化,支持绩效帐户.
- 学校教育和生活环境与所取得的退学程度有积极的相关性,这表明能力发挥了作用.
- 培训干预措施显示出改善全球推理的潜力.
结论:
- 非工业化人口中的推理偏见可以通过有针对性的干预措施有效地减少.
- 逻辑推理能力 (能力) 和该逻辑的应用 (性能) 都至关重要.
- 消除偏差的策略提供了一个有希望的方法来增强全球的合理推理.
更多相关视频
06:58Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
7.4K
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Beck's Cognitive Therapy
55
Cognitive therapy is a psychological approach designed to address distortions in thinking, which can lead to negative emotions and unrealistic beliefs. These cognitive distortions often influence how individuals interpret and respond to situations, exacerbating emotional distress. Below are some prevalent cognitive distortions, their characteristics, and examples of how they manifest in thought processes.
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
Arbitrary Inference
Arbitrary inference involves making conclusions without sufficient...
55
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
