基于自适应性遗传粒子群优化算法的单频GNSS整数模糊性解决方法
Ying-Qing Guo1, Yan Zhang1, Zhao-Dong Xu2
1College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 9, 2023
概括
本研究介绍了一种自适应性遗传粒子群优化 (AGPSO) 算法,通过提高整数模糊性分辨率,实现更快,更准确的单频全球导航卫星系统 (GNSS) 定位.
科学领域:
- 地理学工程 工程地质学
- 卫星导航系统 卫星导航系统
- 人工智能在定位方面的作用
背景情况:
- 使用全球导航卫星系统 (GNSS) 准确的定位在很大程度上依赖于解决载波阶段整数模两可.
- 解决整数模两可的传统方法可能是低效和缓慢的,阻碍了快速定位.
研究的目的:
- 开发一种新的算法,用于高效和准确的单频GNSS整数模两可的解决方案.
- 通过智能优化技术,提高模两可的搜索过程的速度和稳定性.
主要方法:
- 为单频GNSS提出了一个自适应性遗传粒子群优化 (AGPSO) 算法.
- 使用载体相双差方程用于浮点解决方案和共变矩阵估计.
- 采用逆整数乔莱斯基算法来处理关系,并改进了健身功能以提高性能.
- 集成的粒子群优化与适应性权重,交叉和突变,用于强大的整数模糊性搜索.
主要成果:
- 与传统和其他智能算法相比,AGPSO算法显示了更快的融合率.
- 在整数模糊性搜索结果中实现了更好的稳定性.
- 实践实验表明,对于短的基线,基线精度在0.02米以内.
结论:
- AGPSO算法为单频GNSS整数模两可解决方案的效率和准确性提供了显著的改进.
- 该方法显示了实际应用价值,特别是在短期基线场景中.
- 开发的算法有效地解决了现有方法在速度和稳定性的局限性.
更多相关视频
22:10Multi-target Parallel Processing Approach for Gene-to-structure Determination of the Influenza Polymerase PB2 Subunit
Published on: June 28, 2013
13.3K
08:13SwarmSight: Real-time Tracking of Insect Antenna Movements and Proboscis Extension Reflex Using a Common Preparation and Conventional Hardware
Published on: December 25, 2017
8.2K
相关概念视频
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
56
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
56
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.0K
