评估"点击城市:烟草:针对青少年使用香烟和电子烟的学校预防计划"的务实有效性和实施
Judy A Andrews1,2, Judith S Gordon3, Erika Westling1,2
1Influents Innovations, Springfield, OR, USA.
概括
更新的Click City:烟草计划有效地减少了年轻人使用电子烟和香烟的意图. 这种在线干预在各种学生群体和学校环境中取得了成功.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 青少年健康 青少年健康
- 数字健康干预措施 数字健康干预措施
背景情况:
- 年轻人中电子烟使用率不断上升,需要更新预防策略.
- 现有的在线烟草预防计划需要调整以应对电子烟等新出现的风险.
- 单击城市:烟草计划得到了增强,包括5年级学生的电子烟预防.
研究的目的:
- 评估针对电子烟和香烟使用的更新在线计划的实际有效性.
- 评估五年级学生使用这些产品的意图和意愿的变化.
- 为了确定各种学生人口统计学和风险因素的课程有效性.
主要方法:
- 在亚利桑那州和俄勒冈州的43所学校进行了一项实用随机试验.
- 五年级学生被分配到更新的干预组 (n=1327) 或对照组 (n=1346).
- 在基线和干预后一周收集了关于意图和意愿的数据.
主要成果:
- 与对照学校相比,干预学校的使用电子烟和香烟的意图和意愿显著下降.
- 该程序有效地改变了预测使用的关键病因机制.
- 该干预措施对有风险的学生 (以前吸烟,家庭使用,高感觉寻求) 特别有效.
- 计划效应在各州,性别,种族和时间相对于COVID-19大流行相对一致.
结论:
- 更新的Click City:烟草计划有效地减少了年轻人使用电子烟和香烟的意图和意愿.
- 该计划展示了高效的实施和教师满意度.
- 结果支持该计划对所有五年级学生的普遍适用性,包括那些处于高风险的学生.
更多相关视频
09:30A Microcontroller Operated Device for the Generation of Liquid Extracts from Conventional Cigarette Smoke and Electronic Cigarette Aerosol
Published on: January 18, 2018
8.4K
10:44Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
11.5K
相关概念视频
01:29Stimulants
214
Stimulants are substances that enhance neural activity and elevate dopamine levels in the brain, leading to their highly addictive nature. These drugs include cocaine, amphetamines, MDMA, caffeine, and nicotine, each with distinct mechanisms of action and varied health implications.
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
214
01:25Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
371
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
371
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
324
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
324