通过对种族社会结构的历史教育,挑战基于种族的医学
Allison L Skinner-Dorkenoo1, Kasheena G Rogbeer2, Apoorva Sarmal1
1Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athans, Georgia, USA.
Health equity
|December 11, 2023
概括
一个教育干预有效地减少了种族本质主义和大学生对基于种族的医学的支持,挑战了医疗保健中的生物决定主义. 这种方法可以通过重塑未来的卫生专业人员对种族的理解来缓解种族健康差异.
科学领域:
- 种族和健康的社会学.
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 健康差距 研究 研究 研究 研究
背景情况:
- 种族缺乏生物基础,然而医学教育往往使种族本质主义延续.
- 种族的社会构造影响医疗保健决策,并导致健康差异.
- 一个不断增长的运动挑战了种族本质主义和基于种族的医学.
研究的目的:
- 测试一项旨在教育大学生关于种族类别历史构建的干预措施.
- 评估干预对减少种族本质主义和支持基于种族的医学的影响.
主要方法:
- 参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组.
- 干预涉及阅读一篇关于种族和团体讨论的社会政治构建的文章.
- 结果措施评估了种族本质主义,对基于种族的医学的支持,以及对其对差异贡献的信念.
主要成果:
- 干预组显示种族本质主义减少,对基于种族的医学支持较少.
- 干预参与者更强烈地相信基于种族的医学有助于健康差异.
- 研究结果在预备和非预备学生之间是一致的.
结论:
- 交互式教育干预可以有效地减少生物本质主义和支持基于种族的医学.
- 这种干预有可能培训未来的医疗保健提供者,以便更好地了解种族及其对健康的影响.
- 减少医疗培训中的种族本质主义,可以促进健康公平.
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Blinding
2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
170
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
102
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
102
Ethical Issues
972
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
972


