在精神病学中非标准诊断评估的可靠性:一项在巴西门诊机构使用Kappa的研究
Helio G Rocha Neto1,2, José Luiz Martins Lessa3, Luisa Mendez Koiller3
1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psiquiatria e Saúde Mental - PROPSAM, Instituto de Psiquiatria da UFRJ, Av.Venceslau Brás, nº71 Fundos, Gabinete da Direção, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. helio.neto@edu.ulisboa.pt.
European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
|December 12, 2023
概括
使用非结构化诊断评估 (NSDA) 的精神病诊断可靠性被发现是中等的. 需要进一步的研究来提高NSDA对特定诊断的敏感性,并减轻诊断势头偏差.
科学领域:
- 精神病学是一个精神病学.
- 临床心理学 临床心理学
- 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
背景情况:
- 由于可靠性问题,结构化诊断评估 (SDA) 是精神病诊断的黄金标准.
- 非结构化诊断评估 (NSDA) 的可靠性尚未得到充分研究,特别是在非WEIRD国家.
研究的目的:
- 为了测量使用NSDA用于精神疾病的评估者之间的可靠性.
- 在学术门诊环境中,在临床医生更换后对诊断协议进行比较.
主要方法:
- 采用Kappa测量器来评估8个诊断组之间的一致性.
- 采用巴夫卡的测试来评估诊断组的变化趋势.
- 分析了99名受试者的739对重新评估对.
主要成果:
- 总体而言,Kappa的评价是中度的,这表明NSDA的可靠性中度.
- 没有一个诊断组在重新评估后显示出明显更高的变化趋势.
- 人们对NSDA对某些诊断的敏感性和潜在的诊断势头偏差表示担忧.
结论:
- 美国国家药物管理局 (NSDA) 的评估显示出中等可靠性,但对于特定的精神病诊断可能缺乏敏感性.
- 诊断的动量偏差可能会膨胀观察到的协议,需要仔细考虑.
- 建议进一步完善NSDA以提高诊断准确性和可靠性.
相关概念视频
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
346
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
346
Kendall's Tau Test
693
Kendall's tau test, also known as the Kendall rank coefficient test, is a nonparametric method for assessing association between two variables. This test is particularly useful for identifying significant correlations when the distributions of the sample and population are unknown. Developed in 1938 by the British statistician Sir Maurice George Kendall, the tau coefficient (denoted as τ) serves as a rank correlation coefficient, with values ranging from -1 to +1.
A τ value...
A τ value...
693
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
204
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
204
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
725
When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
725
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
385
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
385


