相关实验视频

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Conducting Maximal and Submaximal Endurance Exercise Testing to Measure Physiological and Biological Responses to Acute Exercise in Humans

Conducting Maximal and Submaximal Endurance Exercise Testing to Measure Physiological and Biological Responses to Acute Exercise in Humans

Published on: October 17, 2018

协议和分析技术的方法比较,以评估亚最大适应性测试的结果

Tzlil Shushan^1,2, Ric Lovell^1,2, Shaun J McLaren^3,4

¹Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

International journal of sports physiology and performance

|December 12, 2023

概括

亚最大适应性测试 (SMFT) 显示,运动心率 (HR),垂直PlayerLoad和接触时间提供可靠的测量. 这些特定指标显示出稳定的属性,用于评估有氧能力和神经肌肉状态,无论协议的变化.

科学领域:

运动科学运动科学运动科学
运动生理学运动生理学
生物力学生物力学

背景情况:

亚最大适应性测试 (SMFT) 被广泛用于评估身体能力.
采用不同的技术和方法,导致结果指标的变化.
了解这些指标的可靠性对于准确的评估至关重要.

研究的目的:

评估各种SMFT结果指标的测试-重新测试可靠性.
为了比较不同SMFT协议和分析技术的可靠性.
确定可靠的指标来评估有氧健身和神经肌肉功能.

主要方法:

26名半职业足球运动员两次完成了三项SMFT协议,间隔7天.
收集的数据包括心率指数和微电机械系统 (MEMS) 变量,这些变量来自肩膀和脚上安装的传感器.
使用绝对 (典型误差,变化系数) 和相对 (类内相关系数) 措施来评估可靠性.

主要成果:

练习HR (典型误差1.0%-1.6%) 和接触时间 (变化系数1.5%-3.0%) 显示出高可靠性.
玩家负载的垂直组件也显示出良好的可靠性 (变化系数:5.5%-7.0%).
其他措施的可靠性较低,或在协议和分析方法之间存在显著差异.

结论:

SMFT协议影响结果测试的测试-重新测试可靠性.
练习HR,垂直PlayerLoad和接触时间是SMFT的可靠指标.
这些稳定的测量可以帮助评估有氧能力和下肢神经肌肉状态.

关键词:

运动心率运动心率微电机械系统微电机械系统可靠性的可靠性足球足球足球

更多相关视频

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers

A Rapidly Incremented Tethered-Swimming Maximal Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Assessment of Swimmers

Published on: January 28, 2020

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

相关概念视频

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...