评估促进者对公众审议原则的忠诚:教程教程
Claire Draucker1, Andrés Carrión1, Mary A Ott2
1School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
JMIR formative research
|December 13, 2023
概括
在公共审议中评估促进者忠诚度对于评估研究质量至关重要. 本研究介绍了一个蓝图和模板来衡量促进者如何遵守审议民主原则.
科学领域:
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 生物伦理学生物伦理学
背景情况:
- 公共审议或审议民主是一种与多种利益相关者一起解决复杂的伦理问题的方法.
- 现有的质量评估往往侧重于参与者的投入,忽视了促进者角色.
- 需要方法来评估促进者对公众审议原则的忠诚度.
研究的目的:
- 开发和描述一个蓝图,以评估促进者忠实于公众审议原则.
- 提供模板,以帮助研究人员进行评估.
- 评估促进者忠诚度在特定的公共审议艾滋病毒预防研究伦理学.
主要方法:
- 从审议成绩单中对辅导员的字面评论进行了检查.
- 评估了评论与公众审议的六个核心原则 (平等参与,尊重,社会视角,有理由的理由,不同意见,妥协) 的一致性.
- 开发了一个蓝图和模板来指导促进者忠诚度评估.
主要成果:
- 促进者忠诚度评估是全面审议质量评估的关键组成部分.
- 该研究为研究人员提供了实用工具 (蓝图,模板).
- 来自一个站点的结果证明了忠实度评估的应用.
结论:
- 评估促进者忠诚度对于严格的公众审议研究至关重要.
- 开发的蓝图和模板提供了一种标准化的质量评估方法.
- 这项工作支持在伦理复杂的研究环境中有效使用审议民主.
关键词:
艾滋病病毒 艾滋病病毒 艾滋病病毒预防艾滋病毒 预防艾滋病毒艾滋病毒研究 艾滋病毒研究生物伦理学生物伦理学生物医学 生物医学编码 编码 编码 编码议论式民主 民主 议论式民主参与 参与 参与 参与这是道德上的道德.伦理冲突是一种道德冲突.伦理学 伦理 伦理学评价 评价 评价 评价过程中的过程过程过程.公众的审议公众的审议理论上的理论理论理论理论.这是一个自学教程.更多相关视频
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
3.8K
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
4.0K
相关概念视频
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
102
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
102
