在线自行管理的时间线追踪对青少年饮酒的有效性
Natascha Hareskov Jensen1, Lotte Vallentin-Holbech1, Genevieve F Dash2
1Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Frontiers in psychiatry
|December 15, 2023
概括
在线时间表追溯 (TLFB) 工具准确评估青少年的酒精使用情况,与传统采访相比显示出强大的有效性. 这种数字方法提供了一种可靠的方式来研究年轻人的饮酒模式.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 青少年健康 青少年健康
背景情况:
- 时间线追踪 (TLFB) 是一个验证的面试工具,用于评估最近的健康风险行为.
- 现有研究表明在线TLFB对酒精使用的有效性,但对于青少年和非美国人口需要更多证据.
- 在线TLFB和单项酒精问题之间的比较仍然不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 为了验证一个新的在线,自给自取的TLFB对酒精的使用.
- 将在线TLFB与欧洲青少年的传统TLFB面试进行比较.
- 评估在线TLFB用于测量各种酒精消费指标的可靠性.
主要方法:
- 参与者 (N=30,年龄16-18岁) 完成了TLFB电话采访和自行管理的在线TLFB.
- 此外,还进行了单项酒精问题.
- 一个主体内,反平衡的设计被用来比较饮酒结果跨方法.
主要成果:
- 对于所有饮酒结果,在TLFB采访和在线版本之间发现了强烈的正相关性 (r=0.86-0.94,p<0.01).
- 在两种TLFB格式之间,没有观察到饮酒日,过度饮酒日,最大饮料或总饮料的显著差异.
- 参与者在在线TLFB (M=4.66) 上报告每天饮酒量显著增加,而不是采访 (M=4.12,p=0.009).
结论:
- 这些发现支持在线自行管理的TLFB的有效性,用于评估欧洲青少年的酒精使用情况.
- 在线TLFB为这一群体提供了传统采访方法的可靠替代方案.
- 进一步的研究可以探索其在不同人群中的实用性以及其他健康风险行为.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Longitudinal Research
12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.0K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K


