评论:关于测量误差,PSA翻倍时间和前列腺癌
Lawrence L Kupper1, Sandra L Martin2, Christopher J Wretman3
1Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Global epidemiology
|December 18, 2023
概括
暴露测量误差会影响前列腺特异性抗原倍化时间 (PSADT) 的计算. 这项研究引入了一个工具来纠正这个错误,为患者的治疗决策提供了更准确的概率.
科学领域:
- 流行病学 流行病学
- 生物统计学 生物统计学
- 在瘤学瘤学.
背景情况:
- 暴露测量误差是流行病学研究中的一个重大挑战.
- 前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间 (PSADT) 对于治疗复发性前列腺癌至关重要.
- 现有的PSADT计算通常不考虑固有的测量错误.
研究的目的:
- 要突出一个真实的例子,在PSADT计算中的暴露测量错误.
- 为医生和患者引入一个诊断工具,以纠正PSADT测量错误.
- 为引导前列腺癌治疗决策提供更准确的概率.
主要方法:
- 导出了真实PSADT低于临界值的概率的表达式,以测量误差进行调整.
- 开发了一个Excel计算器来计算PSADT和相关的概率从时间和ln (PSA) 值.
- 分析了与PSADT估计相关的统计问题,使用有限的PSA数据点.
主要成果:
- 该研究量化了患者真实PSADT低于有关值的概率,考虑了估计器变化.
- 为计算这种调整后的概率,提供了一个可访问的Excel工具.
- 确定了当前PSADT估计方法的局限性,通常基于少数数据点.
结论:
- 导出的概率为临床决策提供了一个比未调整的PSADT更可靠的衡量标准.
- 该Excel计算器是医生和患者更好地了解前列腺癌复发风险的实用工具.
- 未来关于PSA翻倍时间的流行病学研究必须包括对测量误差的纠正.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Cancer Survival Analysis
355
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
355
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Statistical Analysis: Overview
6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
73.7K


