Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

243
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
243
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

121
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
121
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

181
Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning...
181
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Steps in the Modeling Process01:14

Steps in the Modeling Process

210
Albert Bandura's theory of observational learning identifies four critical processes: attention, retention, motor reproduction, and reinforcement or motivation.
Attention is the first necessary component for observational learning. It involves focusing on what the model is doing and saying. For example, if you decide to take a drawing class to enhance your skills, you need to pay close attention to the instructor's words and hand movements. The characteristics of the model significantly...
210

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Radial Versus Femoral Secondary Access in Patients Undergoing TAVI: Rationale and Design of the RADIAL-TAVI Trial.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

More than gut feelings? - A functional perspective on epistemic feelings in intuitive decision-making processes.

Cognition & emotion·2025
Same author

Intravascular lithotripsy enables safe and effective transfemoral aortic valve replacement.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2025
Same author

Effectiveness of HAPA-based oral hygiene instruction in patients over 65 years of age: a randomized controlled trial.

BMC oral health·2025
Same author

Semaphorin 3F is elevated in serum of heart failure patients and inhibits cardiac angiogenesis via the VEGF/Akt/eNOS pathway.

Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus·2025
Same author

Risk Factors for Premature Exchange of Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Benign and Malignant Biliary Strictures: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Visceral medicine·2025
Same journal

Building digital bridges: Sustaining medical education in Ukraine during the war through blended online modules.

GMS journal for medical education·2026
Same journal

The influence of gamification on the teaching assessment of human anatomy.

GMS journal for medical education·2026
Same journal

The interplay of research and teaching for better medical care: Balance and dynamic development.

GMS journal for medical education·2026
Same journal

Competencies for medical nutritional counselling of children and adolescents: Analysis of NKLM 2.0 based on an evidence-based catalogue of criteria.

GMS journal for medical education·2026
Same journal

National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) - process description over the last 15 years.

GMS journal for medical education·2026
Same journal

Where do our students go? A blueprint for quantifying the local retention effect and its reach by tracking the career paths of medical students.

GMS journal for medical education·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K

预先的知识是否会影响互动动态和基于问题的数字学习中的学习成果? 一个试点研究研究.

Martin Möser1, Rico Hermkes2, Natalie Filmann3

  • 1Goethe University Frankfurt, Department of Operative Dentistry, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

GMS journal for medical education
|December 21, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

数字基于问题的学习 (dPBL) 表明,具有较少先前知识的群体实现了更好的导师有效性和互动. 之前知识较少的学生学到了更多,尽管所有组的最终考试结果都相似.

关键词:
在PBLBL中,您可以使用PBL.数字数字数字数字数字数字数字.互动互动互动互动互动.学习成就的学习成就.之前的知识 之前的知识基于问题的学习.通过视频学习进行学习.

更多相关视频

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.6K

科学领域:

  • 医学教育 医学教育
  • 认知科学 认知科学
  • 教育技术的教育技术

背景情况:

  • 基于问题的学习 (PBL) 利用录制的视频观测来理解教学小组中的认知过程.
  • 预先知识对PBL学习成绩的影响在医学教育中尚未得到广泛研究.
  • 预先的知识和学习成果是成功实施PBL的关键因素.

研究的目的:

  • 使用视频录制分析数字基于问题的学习 (dPBL) 课程.
  • 调查dPBL群体中不同程度的先前知识的知识获取和交互动态.
  • 根据先前的知识,识别学习成果的区别.

主要方法:

  • 一项试点研究涉及60名牙科学生,这些学生根据学期前多选项测试 (MCQ) 评估的先前知识分为子组.
  • 视频录制的dPBL案例会议被分析为小组互动和导师有效性.
  • 学习成绩通过学期后的MCQ,口头和实践考试进行评估.

主要成果:

  • 具有较少先验知识的dPBL组表现出明显更高的导师有效性和小组交互发言率.
  • 与具有广泛的先验知识的学生相比,先验知识较少的学生在MCQ学习中增加了四倍.
  • 两组之间在口头和实践考试结果中没有发现显著差异.

结论:

  • 在dPBL中的交互动态受到了小组先前的知识水平的影响.
  • 与具有较少先验知识的参与者相比,与具有较多先验知识的参与者相比,参与者似乎从dPBL中受益更多.
  • 虽然获得知识的途径各不相同,但所有dPBL组最终都达到了可比的知识水平.