Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
False Memories01:18

False Memories

90
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
90
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

39.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.0K
Viral Recombination00:57

Viral Recombination

23.5K
Cells are sometimes infected by more than one virus at once. When two viruses disassemble to expose their genomes for replication in the same cell, similar regions of their genomes can pair together and exchange sequences in a process called recombination. Alternatively, viruses with segmented genomes can swap segments in a process called reassortment.
23.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Differentiation drives the erosion of positivity on social media.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Redesigning algorithms to intervene on social norm misperceptions during a national election.

Nature·2026
Same author

Impartial Beneficence Predicts Greater and More Uniform Concern for Others Across Social Relationships.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2025
Same author

Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality in a Simulated Model: At Incident Scene vs During EMS Transport.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same author

Estimating the effect size of moral contagion in online networks: A pre-registered replication and meta-analysis.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same journal

Visual liking as sensory valuation.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Visual preferences across species: A comparative framework.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Collective memory and historical thinking in times of uncertainty.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Does behavioral parent training benefit from cultural adaptations? A critical analysis.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Politics in psychiatry and psychotherapis in Japan with personal reflection; Is cognitive behavior therapy non-political?

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Antisemitism in professional clinical psychology training.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K

人与算法的互动有助于解释错误信息的传播.

Killian L McLoughlin1, William J Brady2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Princeton University, United States; School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, United States.

Current opinion in psychology
|December 21, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

人类的注意力自然有利于道德和情感内容,在线算法利用这些内容,使错误信息得以传播. 应对这一点需要解决用户心理和平台设计.

更多相关视频

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

26.8K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

26.8K
Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

13.3K

科学领域:

  • 心理学 心理学 心理学
  • 社交媒体的算法
  • 信息生态系统信息生态系统

背景情况:

  • 人类的注意力偏向于在线和离线的道德和情感信息.
  • 社交媒体算法优先考虑最大限度地提高用户参与度的内容,经常放大引人注意的材料.
  • 这创造了一个在线信息生态系统,其中充满情感和道德主义内容普遍存在.

研究的目的:

  • 审查人类注意力偏差和内容算法之间的相互作用的证据.
  • 提出一个框架,解释错误信息如何利用这些人与算法的交互.
  • 为有效的错误信息干预建议采用双方向的方法.

主要方法:

  • 对人类注意力偏差现有证据的审查.
  • 分析如何在社交媒体平台上运行内容策划算法.
  • 发展理论框架,整合心理和算法因素.

主要成果:

  • 人类对道德和情感内容的关注偏见被社交媒体算法放大.
  • 错误信息利用这些放大偏见在在线信息生态系统中有效传播.
  • 当前的干预措施可能是不够的,如果不解决用户层面和系统层面的因素.

结论:

  • 需要一个全面的战略来打击错误信息,整合以人为中心和以设计为中心的干预措施.
  • 未来的研究应该在人与算法的交互框架内探索错误信息共享的心理方面.
  • 了解这种相互作用对于减轻网上错误信息的负面影响至关重要.