在工作中熟悉:可怕还是蔑视? 评估熟悉性,领导力和团队识别之间的相互作用
Laura Petitta1, Isabella Lo Castro2, Anna Guerriero3
1Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi, 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|December 22, 2023
概括
组织成员对领导者的熟悉程度提高了领导的感知和群体认同. 适度熟悉同事增强了群体认同,但太多或太少减少了它,显示了一个反转的U关系.
科学领域:
- 组织心理学 组织心理学
- 军事领导研究 军事领导研究
背景情况:
- 了解组织成员的关系如何影响社会认同和领导层的看法至关重要.
- 现有的研究提供了关于熟悉不同利益相关者的影响的相互竞争的假设.
研究的目的:
- 测试与领导者,同事和外部利益相关者的熟悉程度如何影响群体成员的原型性 (GMP) 和领导风格的感知.
- 研究战斗经验对这些关系的调节作用.
主要方法:
- 使用了结构方程建模和不变性分析.
- 该研究调查了435名意大利陆军人员,包括战斗和非战斗士兵.
主要成果:
- 熟悉领导者积极预测所有领导风格和GMP.
- 熟悉同事积极预测了GMP,观察到一个反转的U形关系.
- 对外部利益相关者的熟悉程度并不能显著预测好业务惯例或领导风格.
结论:
- 熟悉领导者是积极领导人认知和群体识别的关键.
- 适度熟悉同事是群体认同的最佳方式,建议对团队动态采取细微的方法.
- 战斗经验没有改变观察到的关系模式,这表明在不同的军事环境中得到了强有力的发现.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K


