SHED指数:一项验证研究,评估葡萄牙可持续健康饮食的价值
Margarida Liz Martins1,2,3, Sigal Tepper4, Bebiana Marques5
1Coimbra Health School (ESTeSC), Polytechnic University of Coimbra, 3045-093 Coimbra, Portugal.
Nutrients
|December 23, 2023
概括
可持续健康饮食指数 (SHED) 是评估葡萄牙健康饮食模式的有效工具. 它与遵守地中海饮食相关,证实了它对葡萄牙成年人的可靠性.
科学领域:
- 营养科学 营养科学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 饮食评估 饮食评估
背景情况:
- 评估可持续和健康的饮食模式对于公众健康至关重要.
- 现有的饮食指数可能无法完全捕捉到可持续性方面.
- 可持续健康饮食指数 (SHED) 是为了弥补这一差距而开发的.
研究的目的:
- 为葡萄牙成年人群适应和验证可持续健康饮食 (SHED) 指数.
- 在新的文化背景下评估SHED指数的可靠性和有效性.
- 为评估葡萄牙可持续和健康饮食模式提供一个工具.
主要方法:
- 对SHED指数的调整和验证.
- 从347名葡萄牙成年人 (18-65岁) 通过基于网络的问卷收集数据.
- 评估标准有效性 (与地中海饮食对比),可重现性 (测试-重新测试) 和构造有效性.
主要成果:
- SHED指数表现出良好的可靠性和一致性.
- 较高的SHED指数得分与适度至高的地中海饮食坚持有关.
- 在SHED指数得分和动物来源食品的比例之间发现了显著的反向关系 (r = -0.281,p < 0.001).
结论:
- SHED指数是评估葡萄牙成年人口可持续和健康饮食的有效和可靠工具.
- 这些发现支持在葡萄牙使用SHED指数进行饮食评估和公共卫生干预.
- 该研究有助于理解饮食模式及其在欧洲环境中的可持续性.
相关概念视频
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
225
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
225
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
280
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
280