评估K-SADS-PL DSM-5的冰岛版本的评价者间可靠性
Hans Hektor Hannesson1, Orri Smárason2, Davíð R M A Højgaard3
1Children's Mental Health Center for the Primary Health Care of the Capital Area (Geðheilsumistöð barna Heilsugæslu höfuðborgarsvæðisins), Reykjavík, Iceland. hans.hektor.hannesson@heilsugaeslan.is.
Child psychiatry and human development
|December 29, 2023
概括
冰岛的K-SADS-PL (学龄儿童情绪障碍和精神分裂症表 - 目前和终身版本) 在诊断儿童心理健康障碍方面显示出良好的可靠性. 这支持其在冰岛的临床使用.
科学领域:
- 儿童和青少年精神病学 儿童和青少年精神病学
- 心理健康诊断 心理健康诊断
- 心理测量评估 心理测量评估
背景情况:
- 学龄儿童情绪障碍和精神分裂症表 (K-SADS-PL) 是一个关键的诊断工具.
- 有限的数据存在于更新的DSM-5版本的interrater可靠性,特别是对于特定的障碍和翻译.
研究的目的:
- 为了评估K-SADS-PL,DSM-5版本的冰岛语翻译的评价者间可靠性.
- 评估这种诊断工具在临床冰岛人群中的可靠性.
主要方法:
- 在冰岛儿童和青少年心理健康服务中,K-SADS-PL (DSM-5) 给了135名门诊患者 (6-18岁).
- 使用科恩的卡帕 (κ) 统计学来评估评价者间的可靠性.
主要成果:
- 可靠性得分从差到优秀不等 (κ = 0.31.0).
- 大多数疾病都显示出出色的可靠性 (κ > 0.75).
结论:
- 冰岛K-SADS-PL (DSM-5) 的翻译通常可靠用于诊断儿童和青少年精神健康障碍.
- 该工具适用于冰岛受过培训的专业人员的临床使用.
相关概念视频
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
56
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...
56
Self-Report Tests of Personality
353
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
353
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K


