Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

164
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
164
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

94
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
94

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The variability of measured and calculated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in statin-treated diabetes patients.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2024
Same author

A case of autoimmune hepatitis associated with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2024
Same author

Performance of renin assays in selecting fludrocortisone dose in children with adrenal disorders.

Endocrine connections·2024
Same author

Factors influencing the derivation and clinical application of blood calcium adjustment equations.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2022
Same author

Reducing neonatal phlebotomy blood losses through the accurate calculation of minimum test volume requirements.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2021
Same author

Quality control failures exceeding the weekly limit (QC FEWL): a simple tool to improve assay error detection.

Annals of clinical biochemistry·2019

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics
14:18

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

Published on: May 27, 2014

21.0K

在多个仪器中使用共同的质量控制目标时测试错误检测:使用模拟和真实世界的数据进行分析.

Eric S Kilpatrick1,2

  • 1Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.

Annals of clinical biochemistry
|January 3, 2024
PubMed
概括

在相同的实验室仪器上,共同的质量控制 (QC) 目标减少了错误检测,并导致QC失败率不平等. 对于准确的测定监测,个人质量控制目标是可取的.

科学领域:

  • 临床实验室诊断临床实验室诊断
  • 分析化学是一种分析化学.
  • 质量管理系统 质量管理系统

背景情况:

  • 临床实验室经常使用相同的仪器和质量控制 (QC) 规则.
  • 对于质量控制目标的最佳方法 - - 每个分析仪的个体或所有分析仪的共同点 - - 尚不清楚.
  • 本研究调查了常见的QC目标对测试错误检测的影响.

研究的目的:

  • 模拟常见的质量控制目标对测试错误检测和错误拒绝率的影响.
  • 为了比较共同的质量控制目标与相同工具上的单个质量控制目标的性能.
  • 用实际的质量控制数据来评估现实世界的后果.

主要方法:

  • 模拟了偏差和不准确性对错误检测的效应,使用常用与个人QC目标.
  • 在六个月内分析了两个相同的贝克曼仪器的质量控制数据.
  • 每种仪器使用100多个QC数据点进行现实世界后果确定.

主要成果:

  • 共同的质量控制目标对仪器之间的系统错误检测产生了不对称的影响.
  • 如果个别测试标准偏差 (SD) 不同,共同的目标会增加一个仪器的QC故障.
  • 在33%的测试中,共同的目标使错误检测率降低了≥0.4西格玛,并且导致一个仪器的控制试验失败的频率增加了两倍 (31%的试验).
关键词:
质量控制 质量控制控制规则 控制规则 控制规则错误检测检测错误检测错误检测错误检测错误检测错误检测错误检测错误检测实验室错误是因为实验室错误.

更多相关视频

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.1K
Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
07:34

Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS

Published on: March 14, 2013

12.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics
14:18

A Strategy for Sensitive, Large Scale Quantitative Metabolomics

Published on: May 27, 2014

21.0K
Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.1K
Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS
07:34

Large Scale Non-targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Serum by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry UPLC-MS

Published on: March 14, 2013

12.8K

结论:

  • 共同的质量控制目标可以减少检测个体试验性能变化的检测.
  • 共同的目标可能导致一个仪器的质量控制失败率不成比例地高于另一个仪器.
  • 需要进一步的研究来确定常见的QC目标的临床影响.