一项横截面调查,探索德克萨斯州动物收容所接收的狗的当前摄入做法:一项描述性研究
Mackenzie Cranford1, Abbey Bing1, Alissa Cisneros1
1Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Frontiers in veterinary science
|January 4, 2024
概括
德克萨斯州的庇护所工作人员在接收狗时使用各种各样的处理技术,对恐惧或侵略性的动物有特定的方法. 需要进一步的研究来开发基于证据的摄入协议,以改善狗的福利.
科学领域:
- 动物福利科学 动物福利科学
- 兽医行为 兽医行为
背景情况:
- 收容所对狗来说是压力很大的,影响了他们的福利,可收养性和安全性.
- 减少摄入过程中的压力对动物收容所至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了调查德克萨斯州动物收容所当前的狗摄入做法.
- 描述在摄入过程中使用的常规检查程序和处理技术.
主要方法:
- 一项在线调查分发给负责接纳狗的庇护所员工.
- 收集的数据包括检查程序,业主交出信息和住房环境.
主要成果:
- 来自市政和私人避难所的64名工作人员参加了会议.
- 根据狗的行为来说,处理方式有所不同:对攻击性狗更有约束力,对平静的狗更少.
- 害怕的狗得到了食物/注意 (89%),毛巾克制 (64%);积极的狗得到了嘴巴 (81%),捕鱼杆 (77%) 和缩短的考试 (71%).
结论:
- 收集了关于德克萨斯州目前避难所接收程序和处理技术的描述性数据.
- 未来的研究应该集中在庇护犬对处理的反应上,以开发基于证据的协议.
更多相关视频
03:46Author Spotlight: Coproparasitoscopic Examination of Dog Stools for Control and Prevention of Zoonotic Parasite Diseases
Published on: December 15, 2023
2.4K
07:05Behavioral Disturbances: An Innovative Approach to Monitor the Modulatory Effects of a Nutraceutical Diet
Published on: January 3, 2017
8.9K
相关概念视频
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Surveys
14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
