证词和统计证据的观察在成人和儿童类别基础上的诱导中相互作用
Zoe Finiasz1, Susan A Gelman2, Tamar Kushnir1
1Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Box 90086, Durham, NC 27708, United States of America.
Cognition
|January 4, 2024
概括
儿童和成人都将观察到的信息与类别学习的证词相结合. 语言框架影响学习者对因果性质的概括方式,儿童对可能不准确的说法更有信心.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 发展心理学 发展心理学
- 语言学的语言学.
背景情况:
- 类别学习涉及整合各种信息来源.
- 证据,特别是通用或量化的说法,可以形成超出直接观察范围的概括.
- 了解年龄如何影响证词和观察的整合至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查成人和儿童在学习因果性质时如何将观察数据与不同类型的证词 (通用,量化"所有",特定,标签) 整合起来.
- 检查与年龄相关的信任证词的差异及其对概括的影响.
- 探索记忆在儿童接受未经证实的说法中的作用.
主要方法:
- 成人 (N=1249) 和儿童 (N=123) 被分配接受四种证词类型之一.
- 参与者观察到不同比例的物体具有因果性质 (10%-100%的成年人,30%的儿童).
- 评估了概括,对证词的信任和记忆回忆.
主要成果:
- 通用和"所有"的说法促使两年龄组推广超出观察到的数据.
- 成年人比儿童更怀疑不准确的量化说法.
- 儿童接受未经验证的说法可能源于错误地记住了有利于证词的观察.
结论:
- 儿童和成年人都从直接经验和证词中整合信息.
- 语言框架显著影响学习者对因果性质的概括.
- 在评估证词准确性方面存在发育差异,可能与记忆过程有关.
更多相关视频
05:35Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
6.7K
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
7.6K
相关概念视频
Inductive Reasoning
60.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.5K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Observational Studies
8.6K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.6K
Introduction to Test of Independence
2.3K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.3K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Naturalistic Observations
15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
