Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

201
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
201
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

130
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
130

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Lower resting-state functional connectivity between frontoparietal and sensory networks is associated with recent pain intensity in a community sample of youth.

Neuroimage. Reports·2026
Same author

Aging and metabolism contribute separately to brain-body health.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Selective molecular and network architecture features underlie brain cortical atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies.

Journal of biomedical science·2026
Same author

Cell type transcriptomic modules reveal shared molecular mechanisms in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.

GigaScience·2026
Same author

Effects of timing and type of trauma-focused treatment on psychosocial functioning: secondary outcomes from a randomized controlled trial in patients with co-occurring substance use disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.

Behaviour research and therapy·2026
Same author

Network and receptor architectures shape brain morphometry in addiction.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same journal

Differential deficits in pattern- versus flash-visual evoked potentials in schizophrenia: relationship to subcortical visual systems, pulvinar nucleus and cognition.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same journal

Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a case report.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same journal

SliceMap: a binary classification-driven 2D pipeline for detecting discriminative candidate regions in brain MRI.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same journal

Pulvinar pathways as skip connections in deep neural networks for vision.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the methodological quality of coordinate-based meta-analyses: the qual-CBMA checklist.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
Same journal

Imaging research, diagnosis, and treatment advances of post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Frontiers in neuroimaging·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

使用层次化的贝叶斯模型重新校准单个研究效应大小.

Zhipeng Cao1,2, Matthew McCabe2, Peter Callas3

  • 1Shanghai Xuhui Mental Health Center, Shanghai, China.

Frontiers in neuroimaging
|January 5, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

这项研究引入了一个层次化的贝叶斯模型来纠正小型神经成像研究中的膨胀效果大小. 该模型重新校准了估计值,特别有利于采样差异较高的较小研究.

关键词:
情况控制差异的差异.效果大小重新校准 效果大小重新校准层次化的贝叶斯模型.膨胀效应大小的膨胀效应大小小样本的样本大小很小.药物依赖 药物依赖 药物依赖

更多相关视频

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.2K

科学领域:

  • 神经成像研究研究的神经成像.
  • 统计建模 统计建模
  • 精神病学是一个精神病学.

背景情况:

  • 小型神经成像研究经常报告膨胀的效果大小.
  • 对小样本的重新校准效应大小估计仍然没有解决.
  • 准确的效果大小估计对于可靠的科学结论至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 提出和验证一个层次化的贝叶斯模型来调整单个研究效应大小.
  • 在效果大小重新校准中包含量身定制的抽样变异估计.
  • 为了解决在小型神经成像样本中膨胀效果大小的问题.

主要方法:

  • 开发了一个层次化的贝叶斯模型来调整效果大小.
  • 对大脑结构的病例-对照差异的影响大小被估计为21项跨物质依赖的研究.
  • 吉布斯采样近似地估计了模型参数的后部分布.

主要成果:

  • 该模型表明,研究具体估计的缩小到总体估计的缩小.
  • 对效应大小的调整范围从0到0.97科恩的d.
  • 在采用较小样本大小和更高采样差异的研究中观察到更大的调整.

结论:

  • 层次化的贝叶斯模型有效地重新校准单个研究效应大小.
  • 这种贝叶斯式方法提高了效果大小估计,特别是在小型研究中.
  • 通过贝叶斯方法利用现有知识,为可靠的效应大小估计提供了强大的替代方案.