基于学校的吸烟预防干预措施是否有意想不到的效果? 对Focus集群随机对照试验的后期分析
Simone G Kjeld1, Lau C Thygesen2, Dina Danielsen2
1University of Southern Denmark, National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark simk@sdu.dk.
BMJ open
|January 8, 2024
概括
这项研究发现,专注于职业学校的吸烟预防计划没有显著的意外伤害. 然而,它强调需要监测吸烟学生的潜在污名化.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 青少年健康 青少年健康
- 干预科学 干预科学
背景情况:
- 基于学校的吸烟预防干预措施旨在改善健康结果,但可能会产生意想不到的负面影响.
- 关于这些意外后果的知识,特别是在职业环境中,是有限的.
- 焦点干预旨在减少学生吸烟.
研究的目的:
- 检查Focus吸烟减少干预措施的潜在意外影响.
- 评估职业教育学生的替代性使用,心理伤害和社会伤害.
- 为增加有关学校吸烟预防计划意外结果的稀少知识基础做出贡献.
主要方法:
- 集群随机对照试验与5个月的随访.
- 八所学校被随机分配到干预 (n=844) 和六所学校被随机分配到对照 (n=815).
- 分析的重点是491名在基线吸烟的学生.
主要成果:
- 关于替代品使用,心理或社会伤害,没有发现统计学意义上的意外影响.
- 干预组的学生表现出较少无聊和压力的趋势.
- 在干预组中观察到吸烟者之间增加污名化的趋势.
结论:
- 焦点试验没有显示出任何显著的意外负面影响.
- 未来的研究应该报告吸烟预防干预措施的潜在有害结果.
- 干预措施应考虑并减轻吸烟学生的潜在污名化.
更多相关视频
09:50Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
11.2K
10:44Comparing the Effects of Electronic Cigarette Vapor and Cigarette Smoke in a Novel In Vivo Exposure System
Published on: May 24, 2017
11.5K
相关概念视频
Longitudinal Research
12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
101
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
101
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
170
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
367
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
367
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
29
Stress often leads to unhealthy habits like smoking, excessive drinking, and overeating, which offer short-term relief but ultimately increase long-term health risks. These behaviors create a cycle that temporarily lowers stress levels but can result in severe long-term health consequences. Breaking these habits is essential to reduce the risk of chronic diseases and improve overall well-being. Three primary changes that support better health include quitting smoking, reducing alcohol intake,...
29
Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
