关于中风康复的前50个最有影响力的文章的特点和方法质量:一个图书法分析分析

Hirofumi Ogihara1, Norio Yamamoto, Yasuyuki Kurasawa

  • 1From the Division of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nagano University of Health and Medicine, Nagano, Japan (HO, YK); Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan (HO, NY, YK, TK, AH, SH, RM); Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan (NY, AH); Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gunma Paz University, Gunma, Japan (TK, SH); Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan (AH); and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan (RM).

概括

引用数量并不可靠地表明中风康复研究的质量. 这次审查发现,高引用率的旧文章与最近最受引用的研究之间在方法质量上没有差异.