群体偏爱对道德判断的影响 - - 事件相关潜在的证据
1College of psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Psychological reports
|January 12, 2024
概括
群体偏会影响道德判断,特别是对相似的外部群体. 然而,在评估高质量的外部群体时,道德评价中的这种偏见可以减少.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 认知神经科学 认知神经科学
- 道德心理学道德心理学
背景情况:
- 群体偏见可以在道德判断中引入偏见.
- 个人可能会根据执行它们的社会群体,对相同的行为进行不同的评估.
研究的目的:
- 调查群体内偏见和群体外偏见如何影响道德判断.
- 通过事件相关潜能 (ERP) 检查这些偏差的神经相关性.
主要方法:
- 进行了两项涉及道德判断任务的实验.
- 记录了与事件相关的潜力 (ERP),以测量大脑活动.
- 参与者评估了内部群体对不同类型的外部群体 (均和高质量) 进行的行为.
主要成果:
- 参与者将更高的道德分数分配给他们的内部组,而不是同质的外部组.
- ERP显示了不同的模式:更大的P2幅度用于群内刺激,更大的N400样幅度用于同质的群外刺激.
- 在将内部组与高质量的外部组进行比较时,没有发现道德分数或ERP的显著差异.
结论:
- 群体内偏见明显影响道德判断,特别是在同质的外部群体.
- 外部群体的特点,如高质量,可以减轻群体内偏爱的影响.
- 在道德评估过程中,ERP提供了神经证据,证明了集团内和集团外成员的差异处理.
更多相关视频
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.4K
09:52How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
Published on: May 31, 2018
7.8K
相关概念视频
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
