在清晰对齐器处理中使用的三个近距离减少方法的准确性比较
Pelinsu Güleç-Ergün1, Ayça Arman-Özçırpıcı2, Azize Atakan-Kocabalkan2
1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, Yukarıbahçelievler Mah. 82. Sokak No. 26 06490, Bahçelievler, Ankara, Turkey. pelinsugulec@hotmail.com.
Clinical oral investigations
|January 14, 2024
概括
电机驱动的近距离减少 (IPR) 方法在清晰的对齐器处理中,与手动操作的技术相比,提供更高的准确性. 患者的不适和焦虑水平在所有方法中都是相似的,随着年龄的增长而下降.
科学领域:
- 矯正牙科 矯正牙科是一種矯正牙科.
- 牙科材料科学 牙科材料科学
背景情况:
- 靠近间缩小 (IPR) 是清晰对齐器牙科中常见的一种程序.
- 评估不同IPR方法的准确性和患者体验对于治疗优化至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较三种近距离减少 (IPR) 方法的精度:手动磨条,电机驱动的振荡盘和电机驱动的磨条.
- 在清晰对齐器治疗期间,评估患者对与每个IPR方法相关的不适和焦虑的感知.
主要方法:
- 一项前性试验,涉及42名接受Invisalign®治疗的患者.
- 应用了三种IPR方法:手动操作的条纹 (n=14),电机驱动的磁盘 (n=14) 和电机驱动的条纹 (n=14).
- 准确性是通过计划和执行的IPR之间的差异来衡量的;通过17个问题调查,患者报告的结果.
主要成果:
- 电机驱动的IPR方法 (第2组和第3组) 显示出比手动操作的方法 (第1组) 更高的精度.
- 第1组的IPR执行量明显低于计划,特别是在特定的象限和牙 (例如,大中央切口,下犬).
- 两种方法之间没有发现患者焦虑或不适的显著差异,尽管随着患者年龄的增加,这些差异会减少.
结论:
- 电机驱动的近距离减少 (IPR) 技术比手动操作的方法更精确和有效,用于清晰的对齐器治疗.
- 手动磨条可能导致IPR缺陷,特别是在大中央切口和下犬上.
- 患者的舒适度和焦虑程度在各种方法中都是可比的,并且随着年龄的增长趋于下降,这表明年龄是调节因素.
相关概念视频
01:13Mass Analyzers: Overview
The mass analyzer is a crucial component of the mass spectrometer. In the ionization chamber, the vaporized sample is bombarded with a high-energy electron beam to generate a radical cation and further fragment into neutral molecules, radicals, and cations. A series of negatively charged accelerator plates accelerate the cations into the mass analyzer. The mass analyzer separates ions according to their mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios and then directs them to the detector. The common types of mass...
01:19Mass Analyzers: Common Types
The quadrupole mass analyzer consists of four cylindrical metal rods arranged in a diamond carrying a DC voltage and a radio-frequency AC voltage. The motion of ions through the quadrupole depends on the field strength, causing only ions of a certain m/z to resonate successfully and strike the detector at a given field strength. Though the transmission rate for these analyzers is high, the exact elemental composition of the sample is not determined because of low resolution; however, they are...
01:15Distance Corrections
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
01:30Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over short distances...
01:17Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...