E ((n) 均等变量图 神经网络用于学习分子的交互性质
Kieran Nehil-Puleo1, Co D Quach2, Nicholas C Craven1
1Interdisciplinary Material Science Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, United States.
The journal of physical chemistry. B
|January 17, 2024
概括
我们开发了一个交互等价图神经网络 (IEGNN) 来预测分子相互作用的化学性质. 这种新型模型擅长从3D分子结构中学习,在预测三维学性质方面表现优于现有的方法.
科学领域:
- 计算化学是一种计算化学.
- 材料科学是一种材料科学.
- 机器学习 机器学习
背景情况:
- 从分子相互作用中预测化学性质对于材料设计至关重要.
- 现有的模型经常与异质分子结构和复杂相互作用作斗争.
- 3D结构信息对于准确建模分子行为的重要.
研究的目的:
- 开发一种基于图形卷积的新型模型,用于预测由分子相互作用产生的化学性质.
- 结合E (n) 等差,有效地从多个分子的3D结构中学习.
- 在各种分子相互作用数据集上对模型的性能进行基准测试,包括新的数据集.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个交互等价图神经网络 (IEGNN),包含空间特征和E (n) 对称约束.
- 使用多输入图形卷积方法用于异质分子结构.
- 使用PyTorch Geometric创建了一个开源数据结构,用于批次加载多图形数据.
主要成果:
- IEGNN在学习跨多个分子数据集的交互性质方面表现出强大的能力.
- 与以前的方法相比,在六个数据集中的四个数据集中,在预测的部落学性质上,实现了最低的平均绝对百分比误差.
- 成功预测了具有可变组成的单层之间的摩擦性质,一个未知的相互作用关系.
结论:
- IEGNN是一个有效的模型,用于从复杂的分子相互作用中预测化学性质.
- 该模型的E (n) 等值和3D结构学习能力提供了显著的优势.
- 开发的数据集和数据结构将促进互动建模的未来研究.
更多相关视频
11:21Bioinformatics Resources for the Study of Glycan-Mediated Protein Interactions
Published on: January 20, 2022
3.4K
10:44Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
Published on: December 7, 2021
2.2K
相关概念视频
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
1.1K
The protons in unsubstituted alkanes are strongly shielded with chemical shifts below 1.8 ppm. Methine, methylene, and methyl protons appear at approximately 1.7, 1.2 and 0.7 ppm, while the proton signal from methane appears at 0.23 ppm. An electronegative substituent, such as chlorine, withdraws the electron density from the protons, increasing their chemical shift. Progressive substitution of the hydrogens in methane by chlorine shifts the proton signals increasingly downfield, to 3.05 ppm in...
1.1K
Protein Networks
4.0K
An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
4.0K
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
50.8K
Noncovalent attractions are associations within and between molecules that influence the shape and structural stability of complexes. These interactions differ from covalent bonding in that they do not involve sharing of electrons.
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
50.8K
Predicting Molecular Geometry
34.3K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
34.3K
Molecular Models
38.4K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
38.4K
Reactivity of Enols
3.1K
Enols are a class of compounds where a hydroxyl group is attached to a carbon–carbon double bond, which implies that it is a vinyl alcohol. A carbonyl compound with an α hydrogen undergoes keto–enol tautomerism and remains in equilibrium with its tautomer, the enol form. Usually, the keto tautomer is present in a higher concentration than the enol tautomer due to the higher bond energy of C=O compared to C=C. Moreover, the direction of the keto–enol equilibrium is...
3.1K
