对HOTV光型类型和Lea Symbols进行比较:系统性审查和元分析
Elizabeth G Van Swol1, Annika Gupta1, Shaun A Nguyen2
1College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
概括
这一系统性审查发现,虽然Lea Symbols和HOTV光型在视敏度测试时间上有统计学上显著的差异,但差异在临床上并不显著. 这两项测试都显示,随着孩子的年龄增长,完成率和速度都得到了改善.
科学领域:
- 眼科医生 眼科 眼科
- 儿科光学测量 儿科光学测量
- 临床研究 临床研究
背景情况:
- 儿童视力敏度测试对于早期检测视力障碍至关重要.
- 叶子符号和HOTV光型通常用于儿科视觉敏度评估.
- 了解这些光型的比较效率对于临床实践很重要.
研究的目的:
- 进行系统性审查和元分析,比较使用Lea符号与HOTV光型类型的视觉敏度测试的完成时间和测试时间.
- 评估这两种光类型在儿科患者群体中的效率和有效性.
主要方法:
- 在PubMed,SCOPUS和CINAHL数据库中进行了系统的文献搜索.
- 搜索遵循了系统审查和元分析 (PRISMA) 的首选报告项目指南.
- 提取和分析了完成率和测试时间的数据.
主要成果:
- 这项研究包括了7948名2至17岁的患者的数据.
- 叶符号和HOTV光型的完成率随着年龄的增长而增加.
- 在3岁和4岁的孩子中观察到平均测试时间的统计学上显著差异,尽管平均差异很小 (2-7秒).
结论:
- 无论是叶子符号还是HOTV光型,在测试时间或完成率方面都没有显示出临床上显著的优势.
- 年龄是影响视力敏度测试效率的重要因素,这两种视觉类型都具有视力敏度测试效率.
- 选择光型的临床决定应该考虑患者的年龄和其他因素,而不仅仅是微小的时间差异.
更多相关视频
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
9.9K
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
14.3K
相关概念视频
01:17Sign Test for Matched Pairs
132
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
132
01:13Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
200
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
200