一个无关紧要的任务对任务冲突难度的贡献
Ronen Hershman1, Ayelet Sapir2, Eldad Keha3,4
1Department of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
概括
这项关于Stroop任务的研究发现,即使需要认知努力,人们也会不自觉地阅读呈现为视觉段的颜色词. 这种非自愿的读取会导致干扰和反向促进效应.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 实验心理学 实验心理学
背景情况:
- 标准的色词Stroop任务涉及对一个词的墨水颜色做出反应,同时忽略其含义.
- 两种类型的冲突可能会出现:信息冲突 (处理相互矛盾的信息) 和任务冲突 (执行多个任务的努力).
- 在Stroop类任务中很少观察到任务冲突或反向促进.
研究的目的:
- 为了调查当颜色单词通过色色段的格斯塔尔特原理被感知时,是否会发生非自愿的阅读.
- 在这个修改的Stroop任务中检查信息冲突和任务冲突 (反向促进) 的存在.
主要方法:
- 参与者执行了一个修改后的Stroop任务,使用可以被视为颜色单词的彩色段落.
- 对一致,不一致和中性试验的反应时间 (RTs) 进行了测量.
- 分析重点是比较RTs以确定信息冲突和反向促进.
主要成果:
- 不一致的试验比一致的试验慢,表明成功地感知了颜色词和非自愿的阅读.
- 中性试验比一致和不一致的试验更快,证明了反向促进 (任务冲突).
- 同时存在的干扰和反向促进表明,即使在认知努力的情况下,也可能发生非自愿的阅读.
结论:
- 即使需要认知努力,也会发生对感知颜色单词的非自愿阅读.
- 吉斯塔尔特原理可以引起自动文字处理,导致Stroop类干扰.
- 这些发现有助于理解自动和有努力的认知过程之间的相互作用.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
734
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
6.2K
相关概念视频
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
81
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
81
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
63
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...
63
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
