基于论证的诱导逻辑,涵盖了受损感知
Selmer Bringsjord1, Michael Giancola1, Naveen Sundar Govindarajulu1
1Rensselaer AI & Reasoning (RAIR) Lab, Department of Computer Science, Department of Cognitive Science, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, United States.
Frontiers in artificial intelligence
|January 23, 2024
概括
本研究介绍了以演和归纳推理为人类中心的人工智能的一种认知微积分. 它使复杂的论点能够得到合理的判断,超越了单纯的形式逻辑的局限性.
科学领域:
- 人工智能的人工智能
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 逻辑和推理的逻辑和推理
背景情况:
- 正式的演逻辑在数学和物理中表现出色,但在裁决相互矛盾的论点方面存在困难.
- 以人为中心的人工智能需要一个支持微妙论证的框架.
- 现有的人工智能系统往往无法解释人类在推理中的认知过程.
研究的目的:
- 引入和使用一种新的认知微积分,整合了演和归纳推理.
- 开发用于人工智能论证的自动推理器 (ShadowProver和ShadowAdjudicator).
- 展示这些工具在复杂的认知场景中的应用.
主要方法:
- 演性认知微积分 () 和感应性认知微积分 () 的开发.
- 实现自动推理器:用于演推理的ShadowProver和用于归纳推理的ShadowAdjudicator.
- 涉及蒙蒂霍尔问题,认知机器人模拟 (PERI.2) 和认知架构 (ARCADIA) 的案例研究.
主要成果:
- 认知微积分和自动推理器有效地判断论点,包括那些基于可能性和概率的论点.
- 在模拟模拟人类水平认知,感知和注意力的实验中证明了有效性.
- 探索利用人类认知缺陷的说服性论据.
结论:
- 提出的认知微积分和自动推理器为以人为中心的AI论证提供了一个强大的框架.
- 这种方法超越了传统的演逻辑,可以处理细微和时间依赖的推理.
- 未来的研究方向包括进一步的工程和这些认知建模工具的应用.
更多相关视频
09:27Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
10.0K
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
相关概念视频
Inductive Reasoning
60.5K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.5K
Deductive Reasoning
55.3K
Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction as compared to inductive reasoning, which means that it uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From those general principles, a scientist can deduce and predict the specific results that would be valid as long as the general principles are valid.
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
For example, a researcher can deduce specific predictions...
55.3K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Reasoning
77
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
77
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
