团队内部冲突传染的动态系统理论
Ajay V Somaraju1, Daniel J Griffin1, Jeffrey Olenick2
1Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.
The Journal of applied psychology
|January 25, 2024
概括
本研究介绍了团队冲突传染的动态模型,显示成员循环通过冲突阶段. 它通过结合诸如宽恕和各种冲突轨迹的断层线等因素来挑战静态的观点.
科学领域:
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
背景情况:
- 关于团队冲突传染的现有组织研究通常假定静态参与,成员一旦参与,就会保持冲突.
- 更广泛的冲突文献表明,除了简单的参与之外,更多的动态和多样化的冲突轨迹.
- 在解释团队内部冲突周期性质的正式理论中存在一个空白.
研究的目的:
- 通过整合微观和宏观层面的冲突研究,开发一种正式的,动态的团队内部冲突传染理论.
- 建议团队成员通过不同的冲突阶段 (脱离,处于风险,参与) 动态地移动.
- 确定影响冲突阶段过渡的关键过程机制 (失误线,宽恕,丧,整合).
主要方法:
- 冲突阶段理论与社会传染理论的整合.
- 关于团队内部冲突传染的正式理论的发展.
- 利用计算建模来证明该理论的生成充分性.
主要成果:
- 拟议的动态模型解释了在更广泛的冲突文献中观察到的各种冲突传染轨迹.
- 证明团队成员可以脱离冲突,并可能在以后重新参与.
- 介绍了传染轨迹的类型及其动态特性 (稳定性,分叉).
结论:
- 该研究推进了团队冲突理论,提出了动态的,基于阶段的冲突传染模式.
- 这些发现挑战了静态假设,并突出了团队内部冲突的周期性.
- 为未来的研究和实际干预提供了一个框架,用于管理团队冲突.
相关概念视频
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
In- and Out-Groups
39.0K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.0K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K


