罗宾逊-福德斯不相似性测量方法用于标记树木的比较
Elahe Khayatian1, Gabriel Valiente2, Louxin Zhang1
1Department of Mathematics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
概括
了解瘤细胞进化需要比较标记树. 这项研究解决了标记树木的罗宾逊-福尔兹 (RF) 距离的局限性,提出了癌症研究的新方法.
科学领域:
- 计算生物学 计算生物学
- 癌症研究 癌症研究
- 进化的建模 进化建模
背景情况:
- 瘤发生和癌症的进展是由复杂的突变史驱动的.
- 模拟瘤细胞进化依赖于分析代表这些历史的标记树.
- 现有的比较树木的方法,比如罗宾逊 - 福尔兹 (RF) 距离,对标记树有局限性.
研究的目的:
- 为了研究罗宾逊-福尔兹 (RF) 距离在比较标记树木时的局限性.
- 引入和评估一种用于在癌症演变的背景下比较标记树的新方法.
主要方法:
- 罗宾逊-福尔兹 (RF) 距离与标记树结构的比较分析.
- 为标记进化树量身定制的新距离尺度的开发和应用.
主要成果:
- 确定了罗宾逊 - 福尔兹 (RF) 距离在应用到标记树木时的特定缺陷.
- 证明了新提出的措施在准确反映标记树上的进化关系方面的实用性.
结论:
- 罗宾逊-福尔兹 (RF) 距离在癌症进化研究中对标记树进行比较并不理想.
- 新的拟议度量为分析瘤细胞进化史提供了更合适的方法.
更多相关视频
12:27Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
Published on: February 15, 2017
7.0K
09:49Divergence of Root Microbiota in Different Habitats based on Weighted Correlation Networks
Published on: September 25, 2021
4.3K
相关概念视频
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Survival Tree
86
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
86
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
1.7K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
1.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
197
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
197
Routh-Hurwitz Criterion II
248
In the application of the Routh-Hurwitz criterion, two specific scenarios can arise that complicate stability analysis.
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
The first scenario occurs when a singular zero appears in the first column of the Routh table. This situation creates a division by zero issues. To resolve this, a small positive or negative number, denoted as epsilon (∈), is substituted for the zero. The stability analysis proceeds by assuming a sign for ∈. If ∈ is positive, any sign change in the first...
248
