Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

200
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
200

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Intention to treat outcomes following management of locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intent: single centre cohort study.

HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association·2026
Same author

Real-World Actionability Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Versus Single/Small-Gene Panels.

Oncology and therapy·2026
Same author

From rehabilitation to performance: reframing vestibular-ocular interventions to optimise sports performance.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

Dental-dedicated magnetic resonance imaging in prosthodontics: Applications, benefits, and limitations.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same author

Erosive tooth wear: what are UK undergraduates being taught?

British dental journal·2026
Same author

Impacts of a Rural Hospital Global Budget Alternative Payment Model on Patterns of Cancer Surgery.

Medical care·2026
Same journal

Association of Toothbrushing, Dental Flossing, and Interdental Brushing with Stroke Risk.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Cervical critical dentin in non-carious cervical lesions: relationship with remaining dentin thickness and implications for restorative decision-making.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Periodontal and Prosthodontic Outcomes of Zirconia Single Crowns and FPDs with Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique: 10-Year Prospective Study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Pre-clinical evaluation of the anticaries effect of an experimental Malva sylvestris extract mouthwash using a cariogenic model in situ.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Five-Year Outcomes of Zirconia and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Cantilever Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prostheses with Different Retainer Designs: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

ACCURACY OF 2D FACIAL PROFILE PHOTOGRAPHS UNDER ROUTINE CLINICAL CONDITIONS COMPARED WITH 3D IMAGING.

Journal of dentistry·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.1K

由代的最近点图像注册引入的量化错误.

Ningjia Sun1, Thomas Bull2, Rupert Austin1

  • 1Centre for Clinical, Oral and Translational Sciences, Faculty of Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Floor 17, Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, SE1 9RT, UK.

Journal of dentistry
|January 27, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

代最接近点 (ICP) 注册可以在3D检查中引入重大错误,特别是对于小缺陷. 数据减去过程有效地减少了这些错误,提高了测量准确度.

关键词:
牙科信息学/生物信息学诊断系统的诊断系统.维度变化 维度变化图像成像是一种成像.口腔诊断是一种口腔诊断.表面计量软件 表面计量软件

更多相关视频

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

6.4K
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

1.1K
Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations
07:45

Quantifying Intermembrane Distances with Serial Image Dilations

Published on: September 28, 2018

6.4K
Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.0K

科学领域:

  • 计量学和3D检查检查
  • 图像注册分析 图像注册分析

背景情况:

  • 3D检查软件可以引入测量错误,特别是低于3微米的缺陷.
  • 代最接近点 (ICP) 注册可能会引入实质性错误 (高达15.63%) 取决于表面复杂性和缺陷大小.

研究的目的:

  • 从ICP图像注册中量化分析错误.
  • 调查数据减去过程是否可以减少测量误差.

主要方法:

  • 经过测试的计量学和3D检查软件,具有校准标准和人工缺陷.
  • 在自由形状表面上进行ICP注册和不进行ICP注册的评估错误.
  • 使用ANOVA分析数据,在p < 0.05时具有意义.

主要成果:

  • 在ICP注册中,存在从0%到15.63%的缺陷大小的错误.
  • 在软件之间和软件内部观察到显著的测量差异,没有明显的优势.
  • 缺陷<3μm显示实质性错误 (13.39-77.50%) 即使没有注册.
  • 数据减去将注册错误减少到<1%.

结论:

  • 商用3D检测软件在3μm以下的测量中引入错误.
  • 不管表面的准确性如何,ICP注册可能导致>15%的错误.
  • 分析结果是不一致的,不能在软件中进行比较.
  • 扫描减去大大减少了错误,但增加了计算复杂性.