Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

91
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
91
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

200
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
200
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

162
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
162

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Evaluating a custom GPT assistant for critical appraisal of biological variation studies by the BIVAC.

Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Biological Variation of Natriuretic Peptides and Other Cardiovascular Disease-Related Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same author

Clinician Perceptions of Somali-American Patients in Specialized Maternal-Fetal Care.

Journal of immigrant and minority health·2026
Same author

An Overview of Allowable Total Error in the Clinical Laboratory.

The journal of applied laboratory medicine·2025
Same author

Development and Evaluation of a Conceptual Framework for the Use of Fetal Myelomeningocele Repair.

Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN·2025
Same author

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biological variation data of urine albumin, albumin to creatinine ratio and other markers in urine.

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.0K

在临床实验室中定义允许的总误差极限.

Jill Palmer1, Kornelia Galior2

  • 1University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, United States; Unity Point Health-Meriter, Madison, WI, United States.

Advances in clinical chemistry
|January 27, 2024
PubMed
概括

允许的总误差 (ATE) 定义了实验室分析物的可接受测定极限. 本审查审查了各种ATE资源,并将ATE与观察到的总分析误差 (TAE) 区分开来.

关键词:
允许的总错误值是允许的.分析性能规范 分析性能规范生物变异 生物变异总的分析误差 总的分析误差

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
07:43

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.9K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

17.0K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
07:43

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.9K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.1K

科学领域:

  • 临床化学和实验室医学
  • 分析毒理学分析毒理学
  • 诊断试验开发 诊断试验开发

背景情况:

  • 允许的总误差 (ATE) 代表了实验室分析物的关键性能规范限制.
  • ATE对于测定验证,患者/仪器数据评估和质量控制策略设计至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 审查和比较各种资源来选择允许的总错误 (ATE).
  • 讨论允许总误差 (ATE) 和观察到的总分析误差 (TAE) 之间的区别.

主要方法:

  • 审查现有的文献和ATE确定指导方针.
  • 对不同的ATE资源进行比较分析,包括法律要求,能力测试,专家组和生物变异.
  • 在ATE和观察到的总分析误差 (TAE) 之间的概念差异化.

主要成果:

  • 为了选择ATE,存在多种资源,包括法律标准,能力测试 (PT) 和外部质量评估计划 (EQAS),专家共识和生物变异.
  • 关于ATE选择的首选来源正在进行讨论.
  • 摘要强调了区分预定义的ATE极限和测试的实际观察到的总分析误差 (TAE) 的重要性.

结论:

  • 了解和选择适当的ATE对于可靠的实验室测试至关重要.
  • 选择ATE资源可以影响测试验收和质量控制.
  • 澄清ATE和TAE之间的区别对于准确解释测试性能至关重要.