对非饮酒者态度的 Cheers 态度的发展和验证量表 (CANS)
Christopher Cheers1,2, Amy Pennay1, Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia2
1La Trobe University, Australia.
Journal of health psychology
|January 29, 2024
概括
对不饮酒者的耻辱可能会阻止人们戒酒. 一个新的尺度,欢呼者对非饮酒者的态度尺度 (CANS),被开发和验证以衡量饮酒者的态度,为修改这种耻辱提供了洞察力.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
背景情况:
- 非饮酒者经常面临社会耻辱,从而制造了禁酒障碍.
- 了解这些态度对于制定减少耻辱感的干预措施至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 开发和验证"欢呼者对非饮酒者态度量表" (CANS).
- 测量饮酒者对不饮酒者的态度,并识别感知到的威胁.
主要方法:
- 进行了两项涉及澳大利亚饮酒者的研究 (N=426和N=389).
- 规模开发涉及项目生成,探索和确认因素分析.
- 规模验证使用了酒精消费,伤害和现有态度尺度的措施.
主要成果:
- 12项CANS尺度表现出良好的可靠性 (α=0.842) 和适合指数.
- 因素分析发现了三个关键的感知威胁:威胁到乐趣,连接和自我.
- 该CANS尺度表显示了与其他措施的显著相关性,支持其有效性.
结论:
- 该CANS是可靠和有效的工具,用于评估饮酒者对非饮酒者的态度.
- 这些发现可以为解决和减少不饮酒者所经历的耻辱感的策略提供信息.
- 这项研究有助于了解围绕饮酒和不饮酒的社会动态.
更多相关视频
05:40The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
3.0K
08:01A Method for Manipulating Blood Glucose and Measuring Resulting Changes in Cognitive Accessibility of Target Stimuli
Published on: August 12, 2016
9.0K
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.0K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.0K
Convenience Sampling Method
8.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
8.9K
Introduction to Test of Independence
2.3K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.3K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
3.6K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.6K
