社会存在对Stroop任务绩效的影响的元分析
Teresa Garcia-Marques1, Alexandre C Fernandes1
1William James Center for Research, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.
Psychological reports
|January 31, 2024
概括
社会存在减少了对Stroop任务的认知干扰. 这种效应在注意力较强的受众和经典任务版本中更强,这表明社会促进会影响认知控制.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 社会促进理论认为,他人的存在会影响表现.
- 斯特鲁普任务测量认知控制和干扰.
研究的目的:
- 通过元分析来审查社交存在对Stroop任务绩效的影响.
- 调查社会便利化背后的认知过程.
主要方法:
- 根据PRISMA指南对33项研究进行了多变量随机效应元分析.
- 检查了调节因素,包括社交存在的类型和Stroop任务特征.
主要成果:
- 社会存在显著降低了Stroop干扰,表明增强了认知控制.
- 这种效果在注意力充的观众和经典的Stroop任务中更为强烈.
- 在评估性受众中没有发现任何效果;效果大小随着更多的试验而下降.
结论:
- 社会存在调节Stroop任务的认知控制,支持社会促进理论.
- 观众的性质和任务设计极大地影响了这种社会效应.
更多相关视频
07:21The Emotional Stroop Task: Assessing Cognitive Performance under Exposure to Emotional Content
Published on: June 29, 2016
41.2K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
1.1K
相关概念视频
Social Facilitation
36.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.0K
Social Loafing
38.9K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
38.9K
