结合方法进行系统审查,并提出社会环境研究的概念和理论框架
Indira A L Eyzaguirre1,2,3, Marcus E B Fernandes1,2
1Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Ambiental, Laboratório de Ecologia de Manguezal (LAMA), Instituto de Estudos Costeiros (IECOS), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, CEP 68600-000, Aldeia, Bragança, Pará, Brazil.
MethodsX
|January 31, 2024
概括
本研究介绍了SODIP方法,它结合了系统审查和开源工具,以有效地开发社会环境问题的强有力的理论框架. 这种方法增强了研究中的知识构建和解决问题的能力.
科学领域:
- 社会环境研究社会环境研究
- 系统审查方法论系统审查方法论
- 发展理论和概念框架发展理论和概念框架.
背景情况:
- 社会环境问题需要强大的理论和概念框架,以获得有效的解决方案.
- 现有的方法在合成各种信息时可能缺乏效率和系统化.
- 复杂的研究领域需要可复制和数据驱动的方法.
研究的目的:
- 提出解决社会环境问题的新方法组合.
- 用系统的方法提出强有力的理论和概念框架.
- 通过使用开放访问软件和工具来促进这些框架的制作.
主要方法:
- 整合问题,干预,背景和结果 (PICO) 框架以及协议和报告结果与搜索,评估,综合和分析 (PSALSAR) 框架.
- 开发SODIP (系统审查,开源数据,数据可视化,漏洞识别,框架建议) 方法.
- 使用系统审查,元分析,开源软件,数据可视化和词汇分析.
主要成果:
- SODIP的步骤证明了在进行审查研究时的稳定性和效率.
- 开源工具对于有效评估和可视化定性和定量数据至关重要.
- 系统审查的综合方法和数据支持建立强有力的理论框架.
结论:
- 拟议的方法组合,特别是SODIP,简化了理论和概念框架的开发.
- 开放式访问工具增强了数据分析和可视化,有助于更可靠的研究结果.
- 这种方法有助于知识构建,并为解决复杂的社会环境挑战提供了一条途径.
相关概念视频
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
101
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
101
Dimensions of Health and Illness
7.3K
The factors influencing the health-illness continuum can be internal or external and may or may not be under conscious control. They are related to the following eight human dimensions, and each dimension is interrelated to one other.
7.3K
Community Based Intervention
43
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
43
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
226
The development of psychological disorders, which are characterized by deviant, maladaptive, and personally distressing behaviors, has been explored through several theoretical approaches.
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
226
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
170
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
170
The Scientific Method
59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K


