相关实验视频
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
14:34
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
Published on: November 10, 2010
75.4K
当代阶级结构:荷兰的资本差异
J Cok Vrooman1, Jeroen Boelhouwer2, Mérove Gijsberts3
1The Netherlands Institute for Social Research|SCP, The Hague, The Netherlands.
PloS one
|January 31, 2024
概括
社会阶级由经济,社会,文化和人力资本来定义,在荷兰揭示了六个不同的群体. 这些资本差异影响社会层次,年龄差异和个人福祉.
科学领域:
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 社会分层的社会分层.
- 经济社会学 经济社会学
背景情况:
- 最近关于社会不平等的辩论强调了收入差异,劳动力市场的转变以及工业后社会变化.
- 现有的理论往往侧重于经济因素,需要对阶级划分有更广泛的理解.
研究的目的:
- 从理论上重新定义社会阶级,基于四种类型的资本:经济,社会,文化和个人资本.
- 通过这种多维资本框架,实证地研究荷兰的社会结构.
- 识别不同的社会阶级,分析它们的特征和社会影响.
主要方法:
- 一项专门的调查与来自国家人口登记册,税务机关和福利机构的微数据相结合.
- 隐性阶级分析被用来评估资源分配和确定社会结构.
- 该研究分析了荷兰人口中经济,社会,文化和人力资本的相互作用.
主要成果:
- 在荷兰,有六个不同的资本群体被确定为:既定的上层阶层,特权的年轻人,受雇的中层阶层,舒适的退休人员,不安全的工人,以及不安全的工人.
- 每个类型都表现出四种资本类型的独特组合,表明仅仅经济因素并不能定义类别.
- 资本资源的显著差异与年龄,社会层次和对政治,社会和个人福祉的不同看法有关.
结论:
- 社会阶级是一个多维结构,受经济,社会,文化和人力资本的影响.
- 荷兰的社会结构包括六个不同的阶级,不同资本组成和生活经验.
- 了解这些不同的资本分配对于理解结构性不平等及其对社会观点和福祉的影响至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.1K
06:54Characterization of Nanocrystal Size Distribution using Raman Spectroscopy with a Multi-particle Phonon Confinement Model
Published on: August 22, 2015
13.5K
相关概念视频
01:21Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
197
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
197
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
11.3K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.3K
01:27Horney's Sociocultural Approach
522
Karen Horney's psychoanalytic theories emphasize the potential for self-realization and the importance of addressing social and cultural, rather than biological, factors in personality development. She challenged traditional Freudian views, particularly Freud's concept of "penis envy," which she argued stemmed from cultural influences rather than inherent biological differences. Horney believed that any sense of inferiority in women was a result of societal conditioning, such as...
522
01:14Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Median of Single Population
134
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for the median of a single population is a nonparametric test used to evaluate whether the median of a population differs from a specified value. Unlike parametric tests, it does not require data to follow a normal distribution, making it suitable for non-normal or small samples. The test begins by calculating the difference (d) between each observation and the hypothesized median. The absolute values of these differences are ranked in ascending order, with ties...
134
02:12Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K