主动和反应性伴侣虐待男性的差异性治疗反应:来自实验室近位变化实验的结果
Julia C Babcock1, Sheetal Kini2, Donald A Godfrey1
1University of Houston TX USA University of Houston, TX, USA.
Psychosocial intervention
|February 1, 2024
概括
为伴侣暴力犯罪者量身定制干预措施可以改善结果. 主动犯罪者从"编辑负面"技能中受益,而反应性犯罪者更好地响应"接受影响". 这项研究支持个性化的虐待者干预策略.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 犯罪学 犯罪学
- 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
背景情况:
- 伴侣暴力是一个重要的社会问题,需要有效的干预策略.
- 了解犯罪者的特点对于制定有针对性的治疗方法至关重要.
- 之前的研究已经探索了对犯罪者的沟通技能培训,结果各不相同.
研究的目的:
- 评估两个沟通技巧干预措施 (删除负面,接受影响) 对主动和反应性伴侣暴力犯罪者的有效性.
- 为了确定罪犯的积极性是否会缓和这些干预的结果.
- 检查干预措施对技能获取,情感,侵略和心理生理反应的影响.
主要方法:
- 重新分析Babcock等人提供的数据. (2011) 靠近的变化实验.
- 随机分配的伴侣暴力的男人,要么编辑出负面的技能,接受影响的技能,或安慰剂/停顿时间的条件.
- 根据违法者主动性的干预结果评估,包括技能学习,自我报告的影响,观察到的攻击性和心理生理学措施.
主要成果:
- 高度主动的犯罪者在接受影响的技能上扎,但对删除负面的技能做出了积极反应,显示出侵略性降低,积极影响增加和心率降低.
- 低主动性 (反应性) 的犯罪者报告说,在接受影响技术后,侵略性降低,积极影响增加,生理兴奋减少.
- 干预结果因犯罪者的主动性而显著受到缓解.
结论:
- 沟通技能的干预表明了基于罪犯主动性的差异性实用性.
- 编辑消极的技能似乎更有利于主动的伴侣暴力犯罪者.
- 接受影响的技能对反应性伴侣暴力犯罪者更有效.
- 这些发现支持了根据事者的特点制定量身定制的殴打者干预计划的必要性.
相关概念视频
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
01:23Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
100
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
100
02:01Group Design
8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
02:12Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
01:47Aggression
27.8K
Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for...
27.8K
02:40The Scientific Method
59.4K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.4K