非常危险的道路危险并非免受低流行率效应的影响
1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Rd, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada. jiali.song@utoronto.ca.
Cognitive research: principles and implications
|February 1, 2024
概括
由于低流行效应 (LPE),司机错过了罕见的道路危险. 这项研究发现,感知到的危险性并没有显著改变LPE,尽管反对于其一致的观察至关重要.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 人类因素 人类因素
- 交通安全 交通安全 交通安全
背景情况:
- 低流行率效应 (LPE) 描述了在视觉搜索任务中错过罕见目标的趋势.
- 司机在寻找道路危险时容易感染LPE,这会影响驾驶安全.
- 道路危险的感知危险性有很大差异,从轻微到严重的威胁.
研究的目的:
- 调查道路危险的感知危险性是否影响低患病率效应.
- 为了确定驾驶员对危险的检测是否受到危险固有的危险级别和稀有性的调节.
主要方法:
- 使用了一个数据集,其中48名评分员评估了视频录制的道路危险的危险性.
- 相关的危险危险性评级与涉及不同流行率的危险检测任务的数据.
- 分析了反对低患病率效应的影响,涉及不同程度的危险感知危险性.
主要成果:
- 随着危险性评级的提高,危险的检测能力增加了,但低患病率效应在感知危险性水平上保持一致.
- 对于实质性和一致的低患病率效应,反是必不可少的;它的缺失导致对最危险的危险物造成不显著的LPE.
- 该研究没有观察到患病率诱导的概念变化,参与者对罕见类别采用更自由的检测标准,即使没有反.
结论:
- 感知到的危险性不会显著改变道路危险检测中的低流行率效应.
- 驾驶中低患病率的效应是强大的,特别是对于高度危险的危险,但反起着关键作用.
- 结果支持决策标准对低流行率效应的考虑,这表明稀有性转移的检测标准是保守的,特别是有反.
相关概念视频
01:28Survey Safety
28
Surveying near highways, rough terrain, or power lines involves significant risks. Working along highways is particularly dangerous and requires the use of warning signs and flagmen. It is safest to avoid working directly on roads and use offsets whenever possible. When highway work is unavoidable, it must follow all safety guidelines. Surveyors should wear bright clothing, such as orange reflective vests, to ensure visibility to motorists, coworkers, and hunters. In construction zones, wearing...
28
01:11Hazard Rate
109
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
109
01:08The Availability Heuristic
6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
01:16Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
3.6K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.6K
02:09Bystander Effect
9.6K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.6K
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
318
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
318