Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.4K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.4K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.6K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

1.9K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
1.9K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

200
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
200

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

E-synthesis for carcinogenicity assessments: A case study of processed meat.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2022
Same author

Artificial intelligence methods for a Bayesian epistemology-powered evidence evaluation.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2021
Same journal

Concept(s) of Health: Lifestyle at the Heart of Modern Health.

Erkenntnis·2026
Same journal

Common Belief and Make-Believe.

Erkenntnis·2026
Same journal

Hilbert's Early Metatheory Revisited.

Erkenntnis·2026
Same journal

Neo-Russellian Abstractionism.

Erkenntnis·2026
Same journal

Epistemic Rationality Begins Unreflectively.

Erkenntnis·2026
Same journal

Forward-Looking Concept Functions and the Function/Accident Distinction.

Erkenntnis·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

通过稳定性分析进行确认:贝叶斯式账户.

Lorenzo Casini1, Jürgen Landes2

  • 1Institute of Economics, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.

Erkenntnis
|February 2, 2024
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

最小模型的稳定性分析可以证实假设,但它的有效性取决于特定的环境. 这种贝叶斯式方法澄清了最小模型在科学确认中的认识价值.

关键词:
基于代理的模型基于代理的模型.确认 确认 确认最小模型的模型.强度分析分析的强度分析风格化的金融事实.有各种各样的证据.

更多相关视频

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

科学领域:

  • 科学哲学的哲学科学哲学
  • 认识论的认识论学.
  • 科学建模科学建模

背景情况:

  • 最小模型的认识价值受到争论.
  • 强度分析被提议用于证实假设,但面临阻力.
  • 贝叶斯框架为稳定性分析提供了潜在的合理化.

研究的目的:

  • 为了提供贝叶斯的合理化强度分析在证实假设.
  • 探索最小模型的确认潜力.
  • 确定在哪些条件下稳定性分析不利于确认.

主要方法:

  • 贝叶斯对稳定性分析的合理化.
  • 从宏观经济学的案例研究.
  • 证据多样性的分析.

主要成果:

  • 对最小模型的稳定性分析确实可以证实假设.
  • 确认值取决于上下文.
  • 确定了阻碍确认的稳定性分析的具体情况,并与证据的多样性联系起来.

结论:

  • 强度分析,当应用于最小模型时,可以发挥确认作用.
  • 稳定性分析的认识学好处取决于具体情况.
  • 了解证据多样性对于评估强度分析的影响至关重要.