推信中的某些短语是否预示着奖学金表现的成功?
Niteesh Sundaram1, K Karisa Walker2, Franklyn P Cladis3
1Department of General Surgery, Crozer Health, Resident Physician Postgraduate Year 2, PA, USA.
Medical teacher
|February 2, 2024
概括
推信中的某些短语预测了同事的表现. 像"给我最好的推"这样的短语表明成功,而"强烈推"和"前5至10%"表明表现不佳.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 研究生医学教育研究生医学教育
- 申请人的选.
背景情况:
- 推信 (LOR) 是评估医疗学员的关键但不完美的工具.
- 节目主管经常给某些短语赋予积极的分数,但它们对表现的预测有效性尚未被证明.
- 本研究探讨了LOR中的特定短语与研究员未来表现之间的关系.
研究的目的:
- 为了确定推信中的12个特定短语是否预测了研究员的后续表现.
- 分析常见的LOR措辞与实习生成功的客观指标之间的相关性.
- 为研究生医学教育中评估LOR提供最佳实践信息.
主要方法:
- 推信分析了12个预定义的短语的存在.
- 同学表现被评估为主要结果.
- 多变量后勤回归被用来评估LOR短语的预测值,控制诸如阿尔法欧米茄阿尔法 (AOA) 状态和第二步临床知识 (CK) 等因素.
主要成果:
- 短语"最好的居民之一" (OR=4.02),"超出预期" (OR=4.74),和"给我最高的建议" (OR=3.87) 显著预测了积极的同学表现.
- "强烈推" (OR=0.31) 和"前5至10%" (OR=0.05) 与负面的绩效结果有关.
- 评估的其他短语没有显示出与奖学金表现的统计学意义上的相关性.
结论:
- 当前对LOR的解释可能会过分强调某些缺乏预测能力的短语.
- 需要为LOR作家和读者提供培训,以改进语言的使用,避免误解主观陈述.
- 改善LOR评估可以提高研究生医学教育中候选人选择过程的准确性.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Correlations
32.8K
Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
32.8K
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.6K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.6K
Statistical Significance
20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K


