相关实验视频
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.4K
通过集团规模和公务员工资分散来控制系统性腐败
P Valverde1, J Fernández1, E Buenaño1
1Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Quito, Ecuador.
Heliyon
|February 9, 2024
概括
这种基于代理的模型显示了腐败如何在公共合同中出现. 更大的团队和更公平的公务员工资减少了系统性腐败.
科学领域:
- 经济学 经济学 经济学
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 游戏理论 游戏理论
背景情况:
- 公共合同中的腐败是一个重要的全球问题.
- 了解腐败的出现和动态对于政策制定至关重要.
- 基于代理的建模提供了一个强大的工具来模拟复杂的社会现象.
研究的目的:
- 通过基于代理的模型,调查公共合同中出现的腐败问题.
- 分析集团规模,工资分散和机构控制对腐败水平的影响.
- 识别促进或减少系统性腐败的条件.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个基于代理的模型,有两种代理类型:商人和公务员.
- 代理人可以采用腐败或诚实的策略,根据回报比较进行切换.
- 系统腐败通过在非对称时间的代理分数测量;构建相位图.
主要成果:
- 确定了三个集体状态:腐败占主导地位,腐败<50%,腐败消失.
- 集团规模和工资分散显著影响腐败水平.
- 增加集团规模和减少工资分散与减少系统性腐败相关.
结论:
- 公共合同中的系统性腐败可以通过增加交互的代理人群体的规模来减少.
- 减少公务员工资的分散是缓解腐败的一个关键因素.
- 该模型提供了设计干预措施的见解,以打击公共采购中的腐败.
相关概念视频
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Groupthink
44.3K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.3K
Systematic Sampling Method
10.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
10.3K
Sampling Plans
181
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
181
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K

