数字与传统的手术指南制造:一个随机交叉研究,对操作者的偏好,难度,有效性和操作时间进行随机交叉研究
Vincent J J Donker1, Karel H Heijs2, Christiaan W P Pol3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Clinical and experimental dental research
|February 12, 2024
概括
牙医学生和牙医更喜欢数字制造的手术指南,发现它比传统方法更容易和更有效. 数字工作流也减少了制造时间,建议将其整合到牙科教育中.
科学领域:
- 牙科教育 牙科教育
- 植入物牙科 植入物牙科
- 数字制造的数字制造.
背景情况:
- 手术指南制造对于植入式牙科至关重要.
- 为了制造外科手术指南,存在数字和传统的工作流.
- 将新的制造技术整合到牙科教育中需要评估.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较数字和传统外科手术指南制造工作流程之间的操作者偏好,感知难度,有效性和操作时间.
- 评估数字制造对牙科教育计划的适用性.
主要方法:
- 招募了40名参与者 (20名学生,20名牙医),他们之前没有手术指南制造经验.
- 参与者被随机分配,首先使用数字或传统的工作流来制造外科指南.
- 测量了运行时间,并通过问卷评估了运营商的偏好,感知到的困难和有效性.
主要成果:
- 大多数学生 (95%) 和牙医 (70%) 更喜欢数字化工作流.
- 学生们认为数字工作流程明显不那么困难,而且更有效.
- 与传统工作流程相比,数字工作流程的平均操作时间更短 (学生:12:34±2:24;牙医:18:07±6:03) (学生:22:20±3:59;牙医:20:16±4:03).
结论:
- 数字工作流在牙科学生和牙医中比传统的手术指南制造方法更受青.
- 数字化方法可以降低难度,提高效率和缩短操作时间.
- 建议将数字制造技术纳入牙科课程,以教导植入式牙科治疗规划.
相关概念视频
Blind Procedures
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...
Randomized Experiments
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...


