我们相信面具:对蒙面面孔的明确和隐含反应因政治取向而异
Gordon P D Ingram1, Erick G Chuquichambi2, William Jimenez-Leal3
1Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de los Andes, Carrera 1 # 18A-12, 111711, Bogotá, Colombia. gp.ingram@uniandes.edu.co.
BMC psychology
|February 12, 2024
概括
政治取向会影响人们对蒙面面孔的看法. 保守派认为戴口罩的人不那么值得信赖,与自由派相比,他们更慢地接近他们,这表明了根深蒂固的偏见.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 政治心理学 政治心理学
- 行为科学 行为科学
背景情况:
- 在COVID-19大流行期间戴口罩影响了人们对可信度,社会可取性和疾病的看法.
- 围绕口罩使用的政治争议可能会导致这些影响因政治取向而变化.
研究的目的:
- 调查政治取向如何影响对面具和无面具面部的评价.
- 检查口罩对被认为可信度,社会可取性和疾病的影响.
- 探索不同政治团体对蒙面面孔的隐性和明确反应.
主要方法:
- 一个预先注册的在线实验,涉及1241名英国和美国参与者.
- 对蒙面和没有蒙面的面部进行评估,以确定其可信度,社会可取性和感知到的疾病.
- 测量政治取向并使用隐性在线VAAST方法/避免任务来评估反应时间.
主要成果:
- 面具对可信度有中等影响,与政治取向有显著的相互作用.
- 保守派认为蒙面面孔比自由派更不值得信赖.
- 参与者更快地接近蒙面面孔,而不是没有蒙面的面孔,但保守派的接近时间相对于自由派的接近时间较慢.
结论:
- 社会规范的差异性道德化,如戴口罩,可以影响社会评估和适合互动.
- 隐式 (反应时间) 和显式 (评分) 措施之间的一致性表明,政治取向对面部感知有深层次的影响.
- 调查结果强调了政治分歧如何塑造基本的社会判断和对被认为遵守社会规范的反应.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
153
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
153
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Conformity
45.1K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.1K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.1K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.1K


