在性土氧化物表面形成环境持久性自由基的形成机制
Danli Liang1, Jiarong Liu1,2, Yuwen Feng3
1Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, Ministry of Education of China, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
The journal of physical chemistry. A
|February 13, 2024
概括
颗粒物中的土金属氧化物可以通过吸附和电子转移快速形成环境持久的自由基 (EPFR). 度的增加增强了EPFR的形成和稳定性,为污染控制提供了洞察力.
科学领域:
- 环境化学环境化学
- 材料科学 材料科学 材料科学
- 计算化学计算化学
背景情况:
- 颗粒物 (PM) 含有与环境持久自由基 (EPFR) 相关的过渡金属氧化物.
- 颗粒中的土金属氧化物 (AEMO) 与EPFR形成有关,但机制尚不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 研究AEMO表面 (MgO,CaO,BaO) 上的EPFR形成机制.
- 将AEMO上的EPFR形成与过渡金属氧化物 (ZnO,CuO) 进行比较.
- 提供对EPFR污染减轻的理论见解.
主要方法:
- 密度函数理论 (DFT) 的计算.
- 吸附剂与表面相互作用的分析.
- 几何结构和电荷分布分析.
主要成果:
- 在AEMO上,EPFRs通过与电子转移的 (C6H5OH) 的离散吸附迅速形成.
- 高度的AEMOs与增加的吸附能量和电子转移相关.
- EPFR的稳定性是由静电和范德瓦尔斯力决定的.
- 在AEMO上的EPFR形成类似于ZnO,但与CuO不同.
结论:
- 在AEMO表面上阐明了EPFR形成机制.
- 确定了AEMO性在EPFR生成中的作用.
- 为了解和解决EPFR污染提供了理论基础.
相关概念视频
Radical Autoxidation
2.1K
The oxidation of an organic compound in the presence of air or oxygen is called autoxidation. For example, cumene reacts with oxygen to form hydroperoxide. Autoxidation involves initiation, propagation, and termination steps. Many organic compounds are susceptible to autoxidation—especially ethers in the presence of oxygen, which form hydroperoxides. Even though this reaction is slow, old ether bottles contain small amounts of peroxide, which leads to laboratory explosions during ether...
2.1K
Radical Reactivity: Overview
2.1K
Radicals, the highly reactive species, gain stability by undergoing three different reactions. The first reaction involves a radical-radical coupling, in which a radical combines with another radical, forming a spin‐paired molecule. The second reaction is between a radical and a spin‐paired molecule, generating a new radical and a new spin‐paired molecule. The third reaction is radical decomposition in a unimolecular reaction, forming a new radical and a spin‐paired...
2.1K
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
1.9K
The presence of electron-donating, electron-withdrawing, or conjugating groups adjacent to a radical center, imparts electronic stabilization to the radicals. Examples of such electronically-stabilized radicals are triphenylmethyl, tetramethylpiperidine‐N‐oxide, and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl. These radicals are remarkably stable and are known as persistent radicals. Some of the persistent radicals can even be isolated and purified.
Along with electronic...
Along with electronic...
1.9K
Radical Reactivity: Nucleophilic Radicals
2.1K
Radicals adjacent to electron-donating groups are called nucleophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with electrophilic alkenes. The SOMO–LUMO interactions are the driving force for the reaction, where the high-energy SOMO of the electron-rich, nucleophilic radicals interacts with the low-energy LUMO of the electron-deficient, electrophilic alkenes. Such SOMO–LUMO interactions are the basis of reactive radical traps, affecting the selectivity in radical reactions. For...
2.1K
Radical Formation: Elimination
1.7K
Another method of radical formation is the elimination process. It is the opposite of the addition route and is driven by the instability of the radical. For example, as depicted in Figure 1, dibenzoyl peroxide yields a pair of unstable radicals upon homolysis. Given its instability, this radical spontaneously undergoes elimination via a C–C bond cleavage to form a relatively more stable phenyl radical. The mechanism involves cleavage of the bond between the α and β positions...
1.7K
Radical Reactivity: Electrophilic Radicals
1.9K
Radicals adjacent to electron‐withdrawing groups are called electrophilic radicals. These radicals readily react with nucleophilic alkenes. For example, the malonate radical, in which the radical center is flanked by two electron‐withdrawing groups, reacts readily with butyl vinyl ether, which consists of an electron‐donating oxygen substituent. The reaction between electrophilic malonate radical and nucleophilic vinyl ether is favored because the radical has a...
1.9K


