因果关系的导向和自发的心理对比
Muhaned Tamim1, Guoxia Wang1, Xiaosong Gai1
1Northeast Normal University.
The Journal of general psychology
|February 19, 2024
概括
因果关系取向影响中国大学生心理对比. 控制和动机导向负面预测心理对比,而自主导向显示了增强这一目标承诺策略的潜力.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 行为科学 行为科学
- 动机 动机 动机
背景情况:
- 心理对比是目标承诺和行为改变的关键策略.
- 因果关系取向描述了个体在动机和目标追求方面的差异.
研究的目的:
- 调查中国大学生因果性取向与自发心理对比之间的预测关系.
- 检查不同因果关系导向对心理对比的原始化效应.
主要方法:
- 研究1:学术自主,控制和激励性取向与自发心理对比的相关分析.
- 研究2:对原始化自主和控制方向的实验操纵,以评估它们对心理对比的影响.
主要成果:
- 控制和动机导向与心理对比有负相关性.
- 与中性和对照条件相比,自主导向的原始化显著增加了自发的心理对比.
- 在研究1中,自主性取向与心理对比没有相关性,但在研究2中,自主性取向与心理对比有显著的影响.
结论:
- 控制和激励的因果关系取向与较少的心理对比性有关,可能阻碍目标实现.
- 自主导向,特别是当启动时,可以培养自发的心理对比,这表明它有助于增强目标承诺.
- 旨在改善对有控制或激励取向的学生的目标承诺的干预措施应考虑纳入心理对比策略.
更多相关视频
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
5.4K
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
5.7K
相关概念视频
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Attribution Theory
13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
313
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
313
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
290
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
290
